...
Leftism and dating social dynamics
The term you are looking for is: "Marxist-Leninist State". You fucking brainlet.
This isnt /r9k/ but seriously to all the lefty virgins here. Work out, get fit and go hang out at the bar and chat up some ladies.
your bound to get a bite if you fish long enough.
Literaly not even this. A lot of people in here have valuable insights into societal operations and social relations. You know men generally are not the most respectful towards women and you know the way people appreciate real connection and not just alienating consumer interests. If you talk about these things and incorporate them into your personality in a non-tinfoil way you can have nice conversations with people. Intelligence is attractive, just read and practice and even if you're overweight you're going to have people who like you.
Everytime, haha.
I don't want this though… Isn't that obvious? Who would want to play through these bizarre and artificial rituals?
The problem is simple, people are obsessed with things that won't make them happy so that they can avoid being /embarrassed/ about their weakness in the face of capital. They need the approval of capital to participate in society therefore we are all self effacing, partly because we fear not being good enough the subjective component and partly because we fear being a burden on others the objective component.
I don't have a girlfriend because I can't afford to pay for dates and I don't have many clothes. First and foremost I'm simply embarrassed about my economic position but I get along with everybody just fine.
The left needs to present a healthy model of masculinity to counter the incel-volcel defeatism out there (and the sort of alpha posturing prevalent in 'red pill' culture, which is just over-compensation anyway).
Sure, we can acknowledge the fact that modern dating culture disadvantages many men. We can point out capitalism as the main driver of this (consolidating resources among an increasingly smaller percentage of men). But unless we present a real alternative, just addressing the problem would get little traction.
The left has the working class archetype of man as builder. Unlike incel culture that wallows in self-pity, and 'red pill' culture which emphasizes sexual strategy, we could get to the root of the problem—the crisis of masculinity in late capitalism.
The builder can work with his hands. The builder creates. The builder doesn't need to be solely reliant on an employer to thrive.
I grew up in a rural area where most of the men weren't well off. But they were often tradesmen (carpenters, electricians, plumbers, landscapers, etc.), and women are attracted to this material value-creation.
That doesn't mean men need to become tradesmen. But it does mean getting off the computer regularly and interacting with meatspace.
There's also men being selective with women. Too often the PUA 'Red Pill' model involves men meeting women in clubs, which often means meeting drama-prone women & gold-diggers (increasing mens' cynicism towards dating). Meeting good women means breaking the atomization and integrating in communal spaces (recreational classes—whether art, athletics, writing, or whatever you're into—is a good way to start).