Drunkposting but serious question:

I'll write a book about it then turn in my allies to the reactionary government.

I have always defended Orwell’s decision here. The stance Stalin took in the Spanish civil war cost the Republicans their victory and by extension put a bullet in Orwell’s neck. He was only getting even when he gave the British that list of soviet sympathizers. It was egoist as hell and I support it.

The assumes that it would be impossible for the various parties to agree to divide the planet between them and field test their varying ideas.

most "leftists" would suffer the same fate as any other social democrat.

lock them out of parliament, same as always.

kore wa

...

kek

Try reading a history book instead of Homage to Kekalonia

Lmao.

You can't just ignore different opinions among Socialists (in this context lol), these will have to be dealt with whether or not we call them tendencies.

Probably laugh at them a lot? It really depends. I could see Coups, assasinations, etc…
I would support it, but I don't think it would work. The kind of autism that attracts legit Anarchists just doesn't work, and the same goes for most other tendencies. I guess the goal would be too revolution 2.0 them if they werent socialists, but they would probably be close enough it wouldn't matter, and people actually being correct would most likely succeed in influencing people that were already Socialists.