Does revolution always have to be violent?

Suddenly I like Nathuram Godse

Liberals need to leave.

This.

If "well" did, why does there have to be a revolution?

the streets mist be litered with liberals blood. the other ones can get rehabilitation or something but the liberals needs to be purged

Gulag. Anglo powers will never cede power bc of votes

Sure, whatever you say.

No fuck off liberal i'll make Stalin look like Ghandi

In theory, yes, all the bourgeoisie needs to do is give up their muh privileges peacefully.

In practice, they're already accostumed to use slave labour, support dictators, fund private armies and terrorist groups all in order to avoid paying an extra nickel in taxes or a fairer trade agreement. So I don't think that's a possibility.

Do you got sources for the first two?

What a faggot.