Does revolution always have to be violent?

Can't well just get along?

I don't know but Ghandi a fucking shit

Point to a single revolution that did not have violence as its backbone.
Recognizing the necessity and inevitability of violence within revolution is one thing, actively wanting a violent revolution so you can bash some skulls in makes you a psychopath.

No

Reminder ghandi said the Jews, Gypsies, Communists, and the rest all should have idly sat by and not fought or resisted as to not give gratification to the Nazis.
Fuck Ghandi.

That's me.
Who /psychopath/ here?

There used to be a time when the term revolution has always implied some kind of violence.

...

fuck ghandi

Trump and Brexit has been the non violent revolution, are you guys completely blind?

More countries are going to to ditch globalist institutions like the EU and regain their national sovereignty, through the only good revolutionary process there is, democracy.

Suddenly I like Nathuram Godse

Liberals need to leave.


This.

If "well" did, why does there have to be a revolution?

the streets mist be litered with liberals blood. the other ones can get rehabilitation or something but the liberals needs to be purged

Gulag. Anglo powers will never cede power bc of votes

Sure, whatever you say.

No fuck off liberal i'll make Stalin look like Ghandi

In theory, yes, all the bourgeoisie needs to do is give up their muh privileges peacefully.

In practice, they're already accostumed to use slave labour, support dictators, fund private armies and terrorist groups all in order to avoid paying an extra nickel in taxes or a fairer trade agreement. So I don't think that's a possibility.

Do you got sources for the first two?

What a faggot.

Interesting. So the revolution needs violent men, but they are not allowed to take pleasure in their duties.

Absolutely. Porky will let you have socialism if you ask nicely. Just look at our success in Europe.

Dictionary of Modern Political Ideologies by Michael Riff (1990, Manchester Univ Press) p. 170 [1]

Fischer, Louis (1950). The life of Mahatma Gandhi. Harper. p. 348.

George Orwell, "Reflections on Gandhi", Partisan Review, January 1949.

Sorry I fell asleep.
The only thing I agree with Gandhi was about Palestine; I hate nerds that bring him up to tell people to shut up and comply.

Historically it's been a very real problem that the sort of men who are good at leading revolutions turn out to be not so good at leading revolutionary governments once the fighting ends.