...
Assange
You can like someone for their actions despite having a different ideology than yourself, you recognize that right?
Maybe I'm different than some of you here, but I don't just shut down and hate/dislike someone else personally just because they don't share my own political views.
I like what he does, I just don't think he is "ourguy" so to speak. I think being anti capitalist is non negotiable with that.
Also, the black flag poster seems like he is intentionally trying to disrupt this thread.
This kind of garbage shitposting should be banned
obviously left-leaning people supported Clinton over Trump, that doesn't make Clinton leftist. What are you even trying to prove by continuing with this?
You're the only one shitting up the thread
the fact that Obama was more than willing to commute Manning's sentence speaks volumes about how much the establishment wants him and wikileaks gone. Although I don't doubt that Trump would consider him just as "dangerous" despite supposedly being anti-establishment.
and? Stravinsky was a tsarist bitch but i still like his music.
Pls ban
it's the little distinctions that make the biggest difference huh?
Imo I think it has a lot to do with the fact that liberal flagship media were so extremely anti-trump, at best, but more often pro Hillary. They see the stakes being so high that something like government transparency is a minor issue– a perk or some line item– and wikileaks hurting Clinton's campaign for the sake of transparency is not acceptable. Those media outlets (huffpo, vox, slate) have lost any kind of sense of fairness to wikileaks because of this. They state as matters of fact that wikileaks is nothing more than a Russian front and an organization undermining American democracy. At this point, the typical liberal would be totally bewildered by the suggestion that they are anything else just because this is considered obviously true to them. The proof is just how obvious it is.