OBJECTION!
How can you proof the parrot is repeating the words of the victim and the defendant, and not just something it heard from the TV?
OBJECTION!
How can you proof the parrot is repeating the words of the victim and the defendant, and not just something it heard from the TV?
Phoenix you're supposed to be on the Parrot's side god dammit
to be honest he is raising a good point.
except it looks like the prosecution is using the parrot against the defendant in this case
because parrots eyes/ears can see or hear any type of TVs image/sounds?
At the murder scene, was the television on? Was there even a television in the room? And did the Parrot explicitly say either of their names?
...
Parrots can not only mimic speech, they can also mimic voice and tone. So if it really did mimic the conversation, it would use the same voice and tone of the people who said it.
Birds copy "songs" (any sequence of noise they heat). And rarely "mix" new stuff.
Ergo, if the parrot repeated "Fuck you Ethal, I'm going to stab you", it's likely it heard it.
It is also unlikely there was a program where two characters argued, sharing the name of the victim and suspect.
The parrot doesn't have to have heard the words at the murder scene.