"A nation of immigrants"

"Critical thinking" is code for liberal rightthink

What I fail to see is how libtards don't realize what happened to the Indians is a perfect example of how ethnic displacement and replacement destroys a people. Also, the depiction of the indians as peaceful and coexistent before whitey, kek.

This needs to get around more, and another one with something about the immigration and naturalization act of the US. Both Canada and the US were pretty much "whites only" countries, from the very start.

You see, people don't have a problem with a superior, stronger country/people destroying a smaller one in combat and taking their land. The problem arises when ruling members, "democratically elected" ones at that of that country/people decide that it's time for them to move on and let loose a bunch of invaders willingly, without protecting their own (actually imprisoning them for wrongthink) just to replace them with more easily controlled ones, that's when people have a problem. They're traitors.

Americans bought the land from the drunk injuns for beads and axes. That makes it legal.

Didn't you hear, being born in the wrong place at the wrong time means you can be charged with the society equivalent of original sin. Guess people confused the step of civic nationalism as the end goal, not just a step to full blown world nationalism.

Relevant as always.

But that's not true. There were no borders in those times, as many leftists smugly say,
Further, the only tribe you could argue was truly unfairly displaced were the Cherokees who won a supreme court case to keep their land.

You cannot illegally immigrate to a place where there are no borders or nation-states. You wouldn't be illegally immigrating if you packed up and moved to Afghanistan (except for the war and occupation) because it's not a country, it's a region.
A country requires laws, borders, and a government. This isn't me being pedantic, it's literally the reason for a nation-state in the first place.

user

I never understood this shit-for-brains argument. How is proving the harmful of mass-immigration in the case of the injuns a counter-point to Whites rejecting mass-immigration? Besides, America as a country is a White construct, and the injuns are as much foreigners to the fundamental nature of America as any other non-white is.

Anyway. OP is an obvious /r/the_donald civcuck who thinks "only the illegals are bad". Promptly fuck right back to that nigger-loving shithole you call home.