One could say that the tyranny of these foreign nations and their poor caretaking of those nations caused this. I think this could be argued to be an impedance on national sovereignty by those nations. You might be able to argue that you have the right to intervene to stop this impedance on national sovereignty (i.e. take control of that nation.)
Western countries need to use this argument against arabic, asian, african and latin american countries. Otherwise you give us the casus belli to invade your country and give a place where these people can live.
We can fit your immigrants in our countries, plus it's now becoming a huge financial burden to support them.
I don't get why our politicians don't bring this up. We have ever right to attack their poor caretaking and tyranny.
Joshua Diaz
You're implying our politicians are on our side.
Jack Mitchell
I take it you were replying to me.
Why would they be against this? This is globalism in a different form - west invasion of these countries. It gives the people with the capital direct control of these nations. Jews are fucking retarded if they don't do this. This could secure returns on their loans of shekels.
Hell Iran-contra created issues to Rockefeller's investments in that region. Now they have a casus belli to take direct control of these regions.
Lincoln Barnes
Why are so many Asians so soulless, and for no purpose?
Cameron Murphy
Profit wise, they should do what I say. It can secure production.
David Jenkins
I've thought something similar.
If Mexicans and Central Americans want to immigrate to America and work as our slaves so badly, why don't we just cut the bullshit and grant them their wish and invade their nations and reduce them to slave states of the greater American Reich?
I'd imagine even after a generation of superior Anglo rule, elimination of problematic elements of society (Cultural/Political elite, criminal elements, Indio trash) through slave labor/extermination and cultural genocide of Hispanic culture there'd be a massive improvement in quality of life in those areas.
William Lee
Not only that, but given that these nations cause such travesty environmentally, it is now in our best interests for the sakes of the need of our nation and people's livelihoods to intervene.
Not only do we need to intervene to prevent the impedance of the human rights of these individuals that flee, but we also need to intervene for the sake of survival of all nations on this planet. We can either invade, or at least threaten to invade and perhaps take more direct control of these nations indirectly.
We shouldn't need walls, but we have to because your governments are so rubbish at running your countries. Perhaps we should say this - either we build a wall, or we take control of your country in order to provide industry for these people through providing:
Immigration simply comes down to bad management of the countries they come from. I think it's time we stopped that.
Nathan Ortiz
moar
Logan Wood
n
Brandon Martinez
I agree, but I also think this should be a goal we pursue after fixing our own country. I've read several articles on people who go down there to help poverty and they all say one of the main problems is that everyone who could be working to make the country better moves here instead. I completely agree with this. So we need the people who are able to work hard to get back to their countries, fix our own country, then work with these people to stop their government corruption and get their economies moving.
