Rebuilding our society

Economy:

Politics:

I can agree with banning abortion in all cases except:

Unfortunately, I cannot agree with allowing abortion if the pregnancy is the result of rape. Just because the biological father engaged in criminal behavior doesn't mean the offspring should be killed. If the mother doesn't want a child resulting from rape, she can give it up for adoption, which would happen anyway if she isn't married

If you read my post, it specifically exempts widows, particularly if the children have a suitable male influence in their lives, such as a grandfather or close uncle.

Further, I suggest you look up "Lebensborn".

Brilliant. We already have groups such as Future Farms of America, 4-H, etc. that specialize in teaching children practical skills in agriculture, ranching, etc. Let's make field trips to the local farm, cotton field, dairy, etc. a regular thing for schools and clubs to do.

Did you notice the "may carry", not "must carry"? It's optional. Basically it implements the same policy that states like Vermont, Alaska, Arizona, etc. have that allows an adult to carry a pistol, rifle, etc., openly or concealed, in public without a permit, but implements it on a national scale. People who are not inclined to carry a gun are not required to.

Polygamy is definitely not the harem fantasy many imagine it to be. But it won't be a problem because most people won't want a polygamous relationship. It WILL, however, help us reverse the white population decline; take note that following the massive population decline caused by the Black Plague and the massive reduction in the male population of Germany following the 30 Years War, the church temporarily allowed priests to marry (rather than require celibacy) and allowed men to take up to three wives, and this was sufficient to help the population recover in a generation or two.

As for gays, if it wasn't clear in the OP, they all got roped alongside the Jews, cucks, and traitors.

Grammatick macht frei.

It helps if we start thinking about what policies we need to implement once we're in power now, rather than scramble to figure it all out after the fact.

Also, gas chamber is that way, Chaim: -→

Read up about the Third Reich policies on that. The common idea was that propensity towards crime is genetic and that lowlifes breed lowlifes. I am not sure if this is scientifically confirmed, as it is too touchy of a subject to research.
Still, an abortion is a better prospect than a fatherless child.

Another thing to consider in a planned economy is the elimination of unemployment completely. Capitalist economists claim that unemployment is natural but Adolf Hitler proved otherwise. Men need to have gainful employment to feel useful. It also gives a man "roots" in the society.

Also, the elimination of urban sprawl should be considered. Massive concrete jungles are not the natural habitat for our people. It is unnatural & should be avoided. Cosmopolitanism is what has created unnatural fetishes and freaks that communists & Jews use to destabilize our societies.

I think city living should be discouraged & land ownership should be made easier. People should be able to work from their own homes instead of commuting to urban jungles every day. In a technologically advanced economy, there is simply no need for an urban proletariat. Living in rural areas and small communities makes better men than the filth that cities spew forth.

Finally, I think that those cities that we do have should be planned so that cars are completely unnecessary. Markets, businesses, and cultural buildings should all be within walking or bicycle distance from residential areas. In fact, stores & markets should not be separate from residential areas. Stores should be at ground level & living areas above them. Having millions of men stuck in traffic congested highways in tiny metal boxes is not conducive to a healthy society.

I second this. If cities are to exist, they are to be as green and inviting as possible, instead of cold grey concrete.

Addendum to economy:

Well if arabs do it, clearly its a smart idea.

Oh wow and I didn't even get to the part where you suggested the average couple can pay off a home loan in 5 years.

...

We don't have enough evidence to say one way or the other. But again, why should the child pay for his father's crime with his own life? If the woman does not want a child that resulted from rape, she can give him up for adoption.

Further, from our days as stone age tribesmen all the way into the late Medieval era, it was quite common for white men to acquire brides via kidnapping or conquest. It's part of our heritage. Rape is much the same, but in this instance it is unacceptable because the woman in question does not belong to the man impregnating her. So while rape must be outlawed and punished, by modern definitions of rape, most of us wouldn't exist if numerous ancestors of ours hadn't stolen a bride from a rival tribe or taking a wife from the people they conquered.

Ask someone who didn't have a father growing up whether or not he'd be better off HAVING NEVER LIVED AT ALL.

Again, children can be adopted out or raised by the state, rather than exterminated. There's no need to waste good genes and another white that could add to our population.

This is a nice idea, but the logical end result would be the entire country being turned into the suburbs, with no vast stretches of wilderness/nature and no concentrations of industry. Any industry, such as shipping, factories, etc. needs the population base to support it, and any population needs the infrastructure (not just roads, utilities, etc., but infrastructure such as groceries, clothing stores, entertainment, etc.) to support it. Hence, cities.

Cities will never be eliminated, but we can fix some of what's wrong with them by replacing apartment blocks with neighborhoods of houses, spreading things out so that people can walk/bike/ride the bus/train everywhere they need to go, and putting parks, gardens, and other nature areas everywhere rather than just concrete and glass as far as the eye can see. Having clusters of homes and businesses where everyone get where they need to without driving for 30 minutes to an hour both ways would be greatly beneficial, but what if you live in Area A, but can't find a job except in Area B? Public transit will only go so far; we can't eliminate the car entirely, but we can alleviate the problem by quite a bit.

It's definitely something we should be discussing and working on.

Arabs also marry their first cousins, in every generation, over centuries. Maybe the problem has more to do with inbreeding than having a minority of your population marry multiple wives.

You assume homes would be expensive in an economy without Jews. Homes didn't become prohibitively expensive until the mid-20th century. And, again, the idea is less to have people pay back loans than it is to provide them with a house suitable for a family and then encourage them to immediately start that family.

It's worked in numerous countries, not just Nazi Germany, and it was a rousing success for the Nazis.

Congratulations, Herr Oberschutze; your sharp eye and keen wits have earned you a promotion to Sturmmann. Keep up the good work.