Is Russia ripe for revolution?

A Holla Forumsyp with red paint is still a Holla Forumsup.

I didn't know SJW wanted a militarized society and were disgusted by modernity. All the rest was barely about credible in inversion (you could say they are deeply triggering and problematics, falsely universalist, falsely progessive, intelorant, not solidar and not concerned about many people well-being). But on the two last, you failed.

I just vomitted a little. "Progressive" is one of the most chauvinist newspeak, it's based on the primitive assumption that history follows a stringent path towards it's end. Thats some serious perversion of dialectics. I'd recommend to read some Heidegger.
Secondly it's a fraud tbh by simply implying your opponent is just "stuck in the past" but not giving any explanation why a certain is "progressive" why and one is not. And yes, that's usually what neoliberals do, seeing liberalism, human rights and economic micromanagement (post-modernity) as universal. Two can play at this game: Your assumption that your specific set of values is the one everybody should have on a global level, is racist.

And?

Read Marx and Freud, lmao. You know, base and superstructure? Ever heard of that?

>"Workers of all countries, unite !" as long as you follow my specific cultural values

Nice try faggot. I was using it as banter, I debate you on liberalism any day, you're probably American, a country that has a history of using the term "liberalism" wrong.

[…] why a certain value is "progressive" and why another one is not

wew, hangover

was a nazi

Something progressive tend to imporve the condition of mankind and to unleash its scientific potential, something conservative tend to lead mankind to self-destruction

For example, wars, dictatorships, unemployement, environnemental destructions are prejudiciable to human beings, mankind and its future, if the world get rid of the curse of wars, dictatorships, waste of ressources and pollution, human condition wll greatly improve. If the world continues in the current path (fascism everywhere, natural ressources depletion, third world war, …), mankind will disappears before the end of 21 century.

That's a simplistic and negative definition of what is progessive" and what is not

I can't give you a more precise defintion because, in my opinion, everyone instincively* knows what is beneficial, progessive and worthy to be defended : Democracy, peace, equality, rational managment of ressources, honesty, solidarity

*I mean that this instinctive "knowledge" is bequeathed by evolution

Maybe so but I doubt they have any interest at all in internationalism.

where did I defended IdPol ? I despise and reject "right-wing" IdPol, that doesn't mean I embrace "left-wing" one

Universal values are not specific, all people on Earth seems to seek peace, democracy and a brighter future for the next generation. This tendency of mankind to sypathy is natural and explainable, read The Descent of Man (1871, Darwin)

Is this supposed to be an argument?

And you are having the authority to define what is conservative and what is progressive, or what?

If you want a global socialist revolution, you gotta have some serious wars.

Enviromentalism is literally a fascist invention though.

What? Most fascist countries are gone

And yet you did not include anything of what argued about before in it. May I quote you again?

How is that related to pollution and Third Worls sweatshop labor? Do you think a NazBol country would have sweatshops?

But you just did, see above.

Fair enough. But the stances vary about how to get there, since millenias.

Quoting Darwin on social issues, eh.

Fuck off, reddit.

Could be view as an ad hominem but … yes

You were already spotted Holla Forums, no need to fall in this meme

What is progressive and conservative is defined by common observations : wars, dictaorships, ressources monopolization and bad managment are obviously prejudicciable to mankind envisaged as a whole

Only one, against the burgies and reactionnaries scums, then peace on Earth until the end of times

????

Putin's Russia, China, arab regimes, corrupyted despotes in Africa, rise of the far-right in Europe and USA

How can you help third world people to escape poverty while despising them for being of an other race/ethnicity. Global cooperation is necessary to address environnemental issues, and it is mutually exclusive with racial/ethnic divisions : everything spent into futile bickering related to archaic habits and institutions is not spent to build recycling infrastrutures, and war cause ecological destructions

Since the main goal of this political system is not the realization of each inidividual and world progress, but produce as much weapons as possible and use iit on other nations … yes

I quote Darwin on serious political issues