The New Left:

The New Left:


Y'all mother fuckers need Bookchin

Kek what does this even mean?

kek I'm pretty sure the whole reason for Marxism is that the Enlightenment failed

Except that Marxism has its roots in the Enlightenment.

that, and Plato

i just love how people view philosophy like the research tree in CIV games

Imo we need new theory of socialism and promote liberal multiculture at the same time.

The "tree" conception is not too dissimilar to the concept of differentiation present in Hegel's dialectical conception of philosophy, tbh

Epicurus. Marx wrote his dissertation about Epicurus.

Which is why it does not translate to reality.

Let me go vomit really quickly.

Tito was ethnopluralistic and pan-nationalist but he wasn't going in about muh diversity which equals unchecked immigration.

There was this graph generated from the "influenced by" and "influenced" fields of philosophers on Wikipedia.

I enjoy nationalist butthurts. When all of the world is mulatto, and it will be, im happy.

I severely doubt that will ever happen.

It takes time but the multiculture is already here doing the magic of destroying national states.

The only good thing Epicurus ever did was get ironically quoted by Seneca.

Socialism is an elightenment ideology fam.

...

Multiculturalism doesn't destroy nations, it never has. Most Nations are comprised of many different ethic groups confined into one geographical area by conquest, and most of these ethnic groups would have nothing to do with each other to a large extent if it was not for a nation state. Nation states are usually multicultural from their very conception, its not new.

this should anger both sides of the spectrum really.

How do you guys define multiculturalism anyway?There is quite a lot of possible situation between "Everybody welcome but leave your own identity behind" and "It's OK if different communities have different laws within our countries".


Yup, but for differents reasons.

Nation is not a synonym for state and government.

I didn't say it was, however you cannot have a nation without a state.

Prove it.

It becomes one though and then the different idpol groups try to force everyone else to conform within their tight idea of what the nation identity should be ie. fascism

Simple look at the origins of Nations. Theirs a reason they're called "Nation states" unless you want to use it in a terribly ambiguous way to mean any community of people which immediately falls apart after any close examination.

Western civilization does deserve some criticism.

The New-Left just goes overboard with it.