Genuine question from a new guy

If I hold you a gunpoint and tell you to suck my dick, that's still a voluntary exchange right? If the alternative is taking a bullet in your head, I'm actually doing a favour to you.

No, that would make it a violation of the NAP. What you need to do is get a third guy with a gun to shoot me if I don't suck your dick, but all the while you also have to say that you don't agree with what he's doing and you think he's being totally wrong while I suck your dick at gunpoint.

Capitalism can't function without a state, ancaps just want to privatize the state.

so circumstantial coercion can't exist in your fantasyland, correct? a rich man in the food business who wants many sex slaves couldn't ensure that there was a food shortage, so that many starving little girls could be done the favor of being taken in as his personal cockservants? Not *technically* coercion - no guns - but he has still created conditions that are ripe for him to get his sick fantasies fulfilled AND to look like the good guy for it.

It really goes to show how meme-tier of a philosophy ancapism is if you considered there to be even the remotest possibility that I was not 100% shitposting in that post.

...

Ayncrapitalism from a functional standpoint is just feudalism

Anarchists want to abolish hierarchy. Hierarchy is where some people have power over other people. In capitalism, the capitalist class has power over the proletariat because they can force them to sell their labor for less than its value. Therefore capitalism is inherently hierarchical.

At the most basic theoretical level, anarchism and capitalism are incompatible. In practice, anarcho-capitalism is just another superstructure to reinforce feudalism as the base.

Unfortunately they are "real" anarchists

the most basic and concrete answer:

1. anarchy = abscense of hierarchy (an archy)
2. capitalism is by definition hierarchical
3. something hierarchical cannot be anarchistic