Andrew Anglin Pushes False 9/11 Narrative and Covers for Jewish Terrorism
Posted on September 14, 2016 By: Blindlight β The Watcher on the Wall
I am still pondering the subject of what just happened after the β911 Andrew Anglinβ article aftermath. Late last night, after producing this video, I started thinking through the ramifications of these blasphemous claims made by Anglin from his September 12th redo of his 911 article where he back tracked, seemingly, from his original assertion that Arabs were primarily responsible for 911.
Actually, it turns out he didnβt really backtrack because, as he says, if they coulda done it without Israelβs help they woulda and like Israel, Saudis are fake allies who hate us so, yes, we must blame them because they are actually just βsand monkeysβ who dislike us for our freedoms!
After deNugent called him to the carpet in an email stating this:
This is the David Duke-Don Black line, and Andrew Anglin is now overtly in bed with them, as even a cursory glance at the DS website demonstrates. Mike Delaney is livid, since this sentence attacks his truthful and masterful 2008 911MissingLinks documentary. However, I did point out to Mike that a bit over halfway down in the Anglin article I find this sentence:
So is Anglin is having it both waysβ¦. and maybe going both ways just for now? Is he going to gradually tone down the Jew authorship of 9/11 until it is totally gone and go full-Duke/Black on this?
deNugent then asks this:
So I would appreciate your frank answer, Andrew. Do you believe Israel and the Jews did 9/11, or was it, as Michael Moore, David Duke and Alex Jones say, βthe Saudisβ?
Second question:
βHas anyone that I or Mike Delaney know physically SEEN you in the last month?β
Third question:
Would you be willing to go on Skype video chat with Mike or with me, and prove you are okay and you are in fact you?β
β¦we have these prime Anglin quotes he gave in response. Within this text, I look back at many WN false flag reactions and see this very same orchestrated behavior in their responses. So what if Arabs didβt do this, we need to scapegoat Arabs out so we will use it!
Anglin goes on to say this:
Who does this man work for?
I have referred to this characterization, that Saudis and Jews are providing support for ISIS as intentionally sloppy truth or in actuality, misdirection. Itβs strongly believed by many that Jews are behind the war on terror as well as THE CREATION of ISIS. This allows Anglin, by stating it this way, to claim that Jews donβt conspire and simply try to influence evil, bad Muslims who are already acting out. This also underplays the reality that the Saudi Kings are essentially Jewish, western creations totally being good goy,β¦assuming the family are goy to begin with, which is in doubt.
Anglin went on to say:
I find it interesting that Anglin has to resort to high speculation to try and get substance for his evil Saudi Arabs theory, never mind that by stating that 19 Muslims did 911 and not mentioning βcontrolled demolitionsβ he is counting on his mostly clueless low IQ white followers to totally miss the misdirection and regurgitate his words to others as facts.