I can see you're still butthurt.
Says the person who is acting as his possibility is an inevitably. Says the person who has demonstrated his ignorance about Trump's security many times.
You're entire argument is built on claiming something is possible and then when countered, tried to insinuate that same thing was probable and when countered again, proceeded to hurl accusations of feelings being hurt.
I'm keeping the thread bumped as it deserves to be so people can see it. You're not saging out of politeness. You are simultaneously trying to push the idea of him being killed as an inevitability while trying to sage the thread.
No, it's how weak your argument is, according to you. You claim that you are merely suggesting that Trump can be killed yet it is possible also that Trump may not be killed. I also commented that it is unlikely that he will e killed because of how good his security is and how tried and tested they are. You then continue to claim he may get shot in the head, when people including myself have pointed out that it is possible he may not get shot in the head. You have no more further argument at that point if you claim you are not trying to comment on probability and merely possibility and if anything, your stance lost meaning ages ago since your assertion is nothing more than a possibility and not an inevitability, unless you can tell the future. Anything more than that is an outright probability, no matter how you look at it, in which case, you lose again. So if we take what you're saying, you're an idiot for continuing to push it is a possibility after having been countered on that point and an idiot for pushing this as a probability without proof and without knowing what you are talking about.
I actually gave you the benefit of the doubt and assumed you were not being willfully stupid. I was mistaken.
Then your argument falls apart since you are operating under the premise an attack is inevitable and not a mere possibility that may not happen.
Nope, I have provided a multitude of arguments showing why you're full of it while you have fallen back on poor excuses and taking my comments out of context, ignoring whole sections of my posts and so one because you have no answer for them because you are being intellectually dishonest or willfully stupid.
No you implied it as a retort to someone saying it was extremely improbable. That is why you started talking about him getting shot in the head. I said the probability of him getting killed is extremely low. Trying to push the idea that he can be killed given his security an extremely dumb thing to say.
And yet here you are. These reddit tier arguments of being holier than thou don't work here as you are here as well. It doesn't make sense and is also an extremely dumb thing to say.
Also, 36 posts showing off your ignorance of his security and trying to meme his death. Wew. As for the helmet you keep coming back to, you do realize the Japanese developed a bulletproof helmet that looks like is hair, right? Of course not. That would require to do something other than talking out your ass.