The future will hold a heavily restricted internet with ISPs selling you access to fb/yt/twitter/wiki/amazon etc and...

I'm very doubtful net neutrality legislation actually enabled that, but even if it did, it's not the reason the average Holla Forums poster was against it. The main reason was bland contrarianism. A few years ago we had a persistent poster here who was ahead of the curve and literally argued against net neutrality by saying reddit liked it.

a pox on thee versooth.
< just shut up about the truth. leave me in my delusions you bastard.
:^)

The reason is the belief (that may be true) that having layer between the kikes and the interweb (corporations) was better than giving it to the ZOG on a silver plate.
Honestly, I don't know and don't care since I'm a yuropoor.

Nobody ever explained how adding restrictions to the fuckery that layer can do makes it easier for the government to do fuckery.

...

Get out newfag. Here's the bill user is talking about
congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/2943/text

First of all: >>>Holla Forums
Second, you know there are not two sides to this, right? It's all part of the plan. Trump and all.

Now, go back.

Holla Forums is not one person, but "the average Holla Forums poster" is a coherent concept.

...

I can smell the /leftpol/ on you, cuckfag.