Intel Hit Wil Massive Lawsuit

No normalfag is welcome on this board, so it works out.

Intel recalled those CPU's.
Cost them almost half a $billion doing it.

Meanwhile, mods on the MSI forum don't think the vulnerability is a big deal.

forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=297707.0

reading that forum gave me cancer

Oh wow

F00F C7C8

look at this damage control using other companies damage control statements to reinforce your own damage control statement.

>Google: oy vey (((most))) of our customers won't see performance decreases on our cloud!
Microsoft: oy vey (((most))) of our customers won't see performance decreases on our cloud!
Amazon: oy vey (((most))) of our customers won't see performance decreases on our cloud!
Apple: oy vey keep buying our scam products (((most))) of your performance won't be lost as long as shown by our goyim approved kosher benchmarks
newsroom.intel.com/news-releases/industry-testing-shows-recently-released-security-updates-not-impacting-performance-real-world-deployments/

also how would they even know if "most" workloads aren't affected by their customers if they aren't spying on their customers to analyze which processes are being run to do what.

Not to sound like I'm defending Intel at this point because they can go bankrupt tomorrow for all I care, but for the sake of playing Devils Advocate, one country argue Google and Amazon likely left ample enough performance headroom for shit like this (cannot exactly say the same abound Unreal or Ubisoft though), it is likely not enough performance loss to warrant Rollins out an entirely new hardware cycle (which would cost far more in the long run than trying to mitigate performance loss over time through subsequent updates). Epyc rollout soon but it isn't happening overnight

This shit is actually cringey please don't do this

Dohohohoho, I don't believe you Intel.