none
Python 3 is a lot better
especially because of the strict distinction between blobs and strings, Python 2 made big mistake by allowing automatic coercion between those.
Why python programmers hate python 3?
Jason Young
Sebastian Edwards
Actually it is fast enough for quite a lot of things if you know what you're doing.
Matthew Davis
it wasn't pointless though.
of course it would be better if these blundering in Python 2 design were not made, but fixing this would require a time machine.
he chose the lesser of 2 evils.
Christopher Taylor
"blunders"
auto completion on android did me a wrong
Luke Reyes
Python 3 has optional type annotations which enable static type checking by tools like mypy. And they are just as expressive as you'd expect: type parameters, sum types, etc. can be used.
Adrian Bennett
...
Christian Smith
...
Asher Martin
Python 3 is good OP, I don't know what you're talking about.
Jaxson Hall
It's one thing to have aids, but it's pretty degenerate to brag about it.
Andrew Mitchell
what's wrong with django?
what the fuck am I reading.png