Archive.is unindexing/deleting content?

Storage isn't free.Eventually they will have to decide when to start purging stuff. Dumping shit that hasn't gotten a single hit in 2 years wouldn't be all that surprising.

The kikes started the shoah. You best have saved the pages all offline. archive.fo/is has been compromised for some time now see >>>/poltech/490 but there's too much content to shoah to go unnoticed. archive.org is full of kikes already and requires pajeet script and google backup/cache is kikes ofcourse.

Average life span of independent website is around 3 years. After that, it's either dead, someone took over, or seagate drive failure occured.
Nothing new. Even archived.org themselves dropped Holla Forums due to political 'controversies'. All thanks to you pol scumbags, that we're all losing the good stuff:

this. just archive as mhtml or something else. 'cloud' is for faggots.

Cry us a river libtard. Besides OP was already shown to be a faggot.

archive.is would hold older archives of the same page.

nice FUD

Would it be possible to create an IPFS archiver that stores the SSL handshake - which could be used to verify a particular page's authenticity?
E.g. if the response is signed by site's certificate, then that archive has not been tampered with.
Otherwise, if we're only archiving the HTML response, etc, any user could spoof what's returned.

Well for archiving purposes this is ok. But for guarenteeing the archive wasn't tampered with before it hit anyone else's server this is useless as the SSL certificate verifier like (((them))) could tamper with it before anyone else gets it.

awo

What did google mean by this?