While attempting to find a thread I archived in 2016 this happened.. the oldest archived thread is from June.
Why did they do this?
Archive.is unindexing/deleting content?
Dominic Lopez
David Harris
Someone must have archived the thread again somehow, that's the only logical explanation I can come up with.
Caleb Miller
but everything else is gone.
Kevin Perry
Archive.is considers example.com and example.com as different sites so you have to search both scopes. Also there might be something wrong with its indexing system as it sometimes don't return all archived pages. In this case you can try searching for
site:archive.is QUERY
on your favorite search engine
Jace Gonzalez
...
Zachary King
i searched with 8ch.net/pol/*, so it should be there.
Isaiah Brown
results are different for http and https
Landon Collins
Don't let some website control your archives.
Just do
wget -mpck --user-agent="" -e robots=off --wait 1
And you'll have an archived copy forever
Jonathan Murphy
That's easy to alter and not easy to share though. Using the site is good for keeping evidence of what content existed at some point in time.
Ian Gray
Are you searching for a specific page OP? What was the thread about?
Aiden Barnes
Storage isn't free.Eventually they will have to decide when to start purging stuff. Dumping shit that hasn't gotten a single hit in 2 years wouldn't be all that surprising.
Aaron Richardson
The kikes started the shoah. You best have saved the pages all offline. archive.fo/is has been compromised for some time now see >>>/poltech/490 but there's too much content to shoah to go unnoticed. archive.org is full of kikes already and requires pajeet script and google backup/cache is kikes ofcourse.
Bentley Allen
Average life span of independent website is around 3 years. After that, it's either dead, someone took over, or seagate drive failure occured.
Nothing new. Even archived.org themselves dropped Holla Forums due to political 'controversies'. All thanks to you pol scumbags, that we're all losing the good stuff:
this. just archive as mhtml or something else. 'cloud' is for faggots.
Thomas Edwards
Cry us a river libtard. Besides OP was already shown to be a faggot.
Camden Anderson
archive.is would hold older archives of the same page.
Matthew Evans
nice FUD
Samuel Walker
Would it be possible to create an IPFS archiver that stores the SSL handshake - which could be used to verify a particular page's authenticity?
E.g. if the response is signed by site's certificate, then that archive has not been tampered with.
Otherwise, if we're only archiving the HTML response, etc, any user could spoof what's returned.
Benjamin Mitchell
Well for archiving purposes this is ok. But for guarenteeing the archive wasn't tampered with before it hit anyone else's server this is useless as the SSL certificate verifier like (((them))) could tamper with it before anyone else gets it.
Liam Moore
awo
Gavin Kelly
What did google mean by this?
Landon Edwards
archive.is is compromized since pizzagate shit
stop using it and just tor up/disable javashit
Jace Lewis
Nice proof.
Matthew Price
voat.co
voat.co
voat.co
not that guy but a searx search brings this up
Nolan Hall
oy vey
Lucas Anderson
It is 3rd -party authentication, it has nothing to do with "archiving for personal use".
Nice bash scripting though.
That is beside the point.
archive.org has a habit of deleting Holla Forums content, so that is not as goos as archive.fo
Also we need other alternatives. topbestalternatives.com
Jose Carter
Just use these if you really want to be "out of this world"
github.com
github.com
github.com
Alexander Lee
russians
Aiden Edwards
Any working alternative for archive.is/fo?
Justin Rogers
archive.org
Juan Lewis
Yes and no. Archive.is is the only one that ignores the robots.txt file and doesn't delete stuff on request. Archive.org and Megalodon.jp check the robots file first to see if they are allowed to index the site and also delete stuff if the owner send a request.
Ryan Thompson
...
Austin Nelson
It's shit.