Battle Thread

A commie is never an ally, only a subversive.

The USSR was a spook tbqh fam.

The type of "left" which SJWs are is not the type of left which we are.
cf.
They're diametrically opposed ideologies, in a sense

(Chezcked)
Shameless self check for the dual dubs, and a sage for the shittiest thread of the week.

Marxism is a retarded theory with more holes than swiss Cheese. The entire justification for communism is the "labour theory of value", which can be debunked in a matter of minutes.

really, because it seems that all the objections were settled in this thread
see

this string of replies.

ref.
Can you demonstrate a "hole" in the actual theory, meaning something other than "the concept he labels 'value' is not equivalent to the concept we label 'utility' "?

That just reads as a mindless spew of word salad

The labour theory of value is bogus because it assumes the value of labour is inherent to the labour itself. Labour, like most other things, is simply another commodity whose value is determined by the market within which it is traded/sold. When a "capitalist" pays a worker, he is not paying "less" than the "true value" that worker has produced, since the value of said labour is always subjective and dependent on the context of the market. Whatever that labourer is paid is exactly what their labour is worth in the context of the market they reside in. No more, no less

This is why Marx's theory was entirely incorrect. It tried to operate under the assumption that labour itself was inherently valuable and said value could be "skimmed" off by the employer rather than being just another commodity that can be bought/sold within a free market.

So this is why /lit/ has become so unbearable?

Now I just want to go back and bump every thread they try to stirnerpost. God, I always hated the stirnerfags, now I know why.

The infograph on shilling will be a handy resource OP, good thinking. Won't need to explain shilling every time.

No, it doesn't. Go over it again.
It'a nonsense to say that the theory of how cars work is "wrong" because the definition of "cars" doesn't agree with the definition of "carriages." That's basically what your argument is.

"Value" in the Marxist sense is not supposed to mean "utility." It is a different concept.