Mock the shit out of it, but make it sound like it's pro feminism or something. Your average SJW isn't very good with detecting irony so just subtle enough they'll fall for it.
So I have this project on github I want to add a COC to...
and hit refresh until you find one you like.
Ironic COCs are still COCs
It has a purpose if it is to make a mockery of COC
By creating a github issue or by attempting to contribute to this project, you accept the following Code of Conduct. You will be held to it also when discussing the project with members of the community.
1. You may not attempt to get the project to adopt a Code of Conduct. We already have one. This is it.
2. You may not criticize the code of conduct. The conduct is incapable of criticizing you. Check your privilege.
3. The community should use a 'progressive stack' where possible, in order to ensure equality in how voices are heard and issues are handled. Unlike other projects which leave the nature of that stack to be handled apparently by tradition, this project has a definite standard in mind: posters with characteristics that correlate with a statistical advantage in admissions into Ivy League schools will be heard after other posters, scaling with the advantage. For example, a Jewish person is 1000% (one thousand percent) more likely to be admitted to an Ivy League school. Issues submitted by Jewish persons therefore will be heard after a thousand non-Jewish issues, however long that takes.
4. Please properly identify yourselves so that #3 can be applied fairly. NO CHEATING
(checked)
and keked
LMAO. One of the results was the Ferengi rules of acquisition. I'm seriously considering making it the COC
Hello there. You may find my Code of Conduct Keeping to be interesting for this purpose:
verisimilitudes.net
Take the Contributor covenant, take out the SJW wording, then rewrite it in legalese. Preferably not in English.
For example
to
etc, more definitions like The Project
Etcetera. Make sure to write it as obtuse as possible while still remaining clear and unambiguous with as many loopholes as possible, this isn't even close to optimal.
This is probably what you're looking for: github.com