WITH JEWS YOU LOSE
Get the fuck in here
Oh ctr, you're so low energy you make ¡yeb! look good
ok- here's what I got:
another email from earlier in the chain verified with the DKIM:
wikileaks.org
Brad is their pointman
Brad Pollock
From: Brad Pollock >>
ref:
wikileaks.org
refined search (newest emails first):
wikileaks.org
Could also be Brad Woodhouse, but that's CTR. Wouldn't make much sense. Linking anyway:
wikileaks.org
As for Welch,
Kathleen Welch, from here:
wikileaks.org
same timeframe, meets threshold for match
More info on Corridor Partners:
corridorpartners.com
They are liaisons between big money and bundled donations, looks like
They're the enforcers with any kind of donation larger than a few hundred bucks. Perhaps they choked out Bernie's campaign and pigeonholed him into relying solely on small donations? Need more eyes on this company.
Here's the whois:
whois.icann.org
Registered under William J. Roberts
Here's what turned up from him in WikiLeaks:
wikileaks.org
Weird shit with him in the loop.
Back to Corridor Partners, though:
corridorpartners.com
5-person team with 2 of them as principals? This is a super small operation. Team page also lists William as "Bill Roberts." Might search there as well:
wikileaks.org
Many more leads to look through there.
All I got for now. Let's see what else we can find, patriots.
JR, that you?
Isn't it normal for competing candidates from the same party to establish "rules of conduct" so that they don't make the other look too bad or dig up dirt that is too damaging?
The above could be read as Bernie and Hillary's camp previously coming to an agreement that Bernie wouldn't attack her on issue a,b,c and she wouldn't attack him on x,y,z. That's to be expected.
Peter doesn't make sense, and that's why I kept looking. I suspect that it's Kathleen.
Don't assume that you get a 100% match based on last name. In my email list that I've compiled, I often get 2-4 members of her outer orbit with the same last name. Too late in the game to be making amateur assumptions like that.
Stay frosty.
Smartass.
Very interesting. Will check in the AM. Again, good find user. This is enough to get all the cross-over Bernouts I know to kvetch till Wednesday.
You're missing that in context, they're talking about an agreement AND leverage.
Read the whole fucking email. wtf I literally said "read the whole thing-" "3 times."
If you're going to pick apart single words of phrases from my argument, I have no interest in further engagement. The email in my OP- with the whole chain (as far as has been released) is what I'm talking about.
Focus more on the leverage. See if there's anything else you can find in 27 or 28 to do with what kind of leverage they had over him. Try and narrow your search to May or June of 2015.
Sorry I flew off the handle, shouldn't have flung out "idiot"
How does Peter Welch not make sense though? Isn't he a Dem from Vermont?
...