Major weapon that could kill cucked journalism for good

No point unless you can attract massive segments of normies.

I already filter my own news for myself, I'm not a normie retard that needs somebody to do it for me

this has nothing to fucking do with archiving.

read the proposal, the intent is to RATE, rating strikes a personal ground, archiving just doesn't give them views.

When a movie is rated on RT, the sales goes tremendously bad and the director receives a bad rep, having articles in the same spotlight and treated in such a way, the psychological impact would be "similar" not entirely the same, the priority is difference but if you are a career journalist and you get a page of some folks reviewing you, then your career is no longer a safe space, right now journos can get away with whatever the fuck they shitpost because this type of system is either nonexistent OR badly advertised, i'm not entirely sure about digg.

What meme language did you write it in? I'd have to imagine python, c/c++ and java would have nlp libs far superior to anything webdevs would write.

Dig was kind of like reddit before reddit, but was less successful at pretending that it was actually democratic. When they were failing they intentionally destroyed their own site with a redesign to shift blame for their failure from the truth of "goons run this shit into the ground" to "OMG our web design people are tards".

Community went on to worse things at reddit

first off, i'm not a programmer, and even if I was I wouldn't host nor declare myself the owner of such a project, I would only support it.

Secondly, I offered help with the design, because I work with web design, commercials, etc, this is part of what I do, it's not an idea you fucking moron, creativity exist and you lack them, I can tell you're asian gook who was born in the far east, suicide rates are up like never before in your country, you should consider killing yourself.

also filtered.

I did recall digg awhile back, didn't they have a series of TV commercial with some gay shovel or is that something else entirely?

You want a good idea? Here you go:
Here in Germany (And I bet in the US too) we have the problem that all the big news sites censor or even block the comment sections of their articles.
They do that so noone can correct their misinformation.

Create a browser plugin that blends in our own comment section based on URLs.
Comments could be A) saved on a dedicated server. Or even better B)Distributed via P2P
From that point on it becomes impossible to suppress free speech.
Blocked youtube comment sections? also gone.

Critical part would be that the plugin has to reach a widespread audience.

Not sure, I don't watch TV. Digg was big for awhile but it seems like an eternity ago now.

Another way of thinking about Digg is that it was somewhere between Fark and Reddit… or maybe that just confuses matters more

what makes you think jews wouldn't flood the website with comments and reviews positive of their kosher peers? And negative reviews of their own critics?

I've thought of doing this before, but I thought there was already something like it. The P2P part is interesting though.

Shilling is always going to happen. What is important is that administration not be coopted.