Major weapon that could kill cucked journalism for good

I tried taking each individual word of OP's post and thinking what could they mean in a more general context and still no Eureka. You're over estimating my intelligence (or you're a shill deliberately wasting everyone's time).

Back on the vine tomato. This ain't no soup kitchen. "cancerous"

Is it just me or can anyone else make anything sensible out of this?

but why bother making a review for something if you could just put it on the list and allow users to rate and do the reviews themselves like on steam, thats how RT works, articles should function the same way, the only difficulty I see is keeping up with the constant flow of shit being released, which is hundreds and thousands of articles released everyday, the immense flow itself could be the big reason that this could not work, the rest is pretty dandy, if a system can be made to automatically capture articles from different areas and put them up for shitting then fine, individually and manually putting them on the list is really bad.

CONT.

Also forgot to mention a potential feature that could be used to sort articles by ratings and popularity, and also have the worst and the best on the list, and it also sorts by day/month/year so its constantly changing every second.

how did this conversation begin exactly?

Second for this, you can link journos' malpractice under everything they do, informing the uninformed of just how trustworthy they are not.

OP needs a fat, ugly wife and then he can launch Snopes 2.0 politico edition from his mom's basement.

Good idea. Anything to break the guess who-ish stranglehold.

Wasn't Voat supposed to be the unpozzed Reddit?