I would like Holla Forums opinion of something

Labor zionism does not represent socialism as a whole. Neither does Nazi Germany. Or anarchism. Or communism. There are many flavors of socialism.

Regulated capitalism where the government shatters monopolies to pieces when they break the law or just get too big.

you need a government to have a monopoly in the first place

It wasn't real communism

IT WASN'T REAL COMMUNISM

Attached: af7e02584adf991aa6a723cd4e80420337d32375d4a016eb21a1f780a445a0ba.jpg (793x1400, 517.96K)

You have to understand what the terms mean. Then you will realize that they are not opposites.

(((capitalism))) – when a cabal of capitalists (bankers, merchants, investors) control a government, dictating to a nation-state its economic policies, with regard only for their profits, and not any philosophical outlook

(((socialism))) – a political fantasy that claims capitalism can be overcame by political action which will not result in more capitalism because this time the people with all the economic power will be directly elected, albeit those elections will still involve campaign donations from capitalists, so that the government becomes helmed by responsible stewards of the public interest, and cannot be corrupted

Capitalism is the factual reality. Socialism is the performance art capitalists use to enhance their influence.

pure capitalism

capitalism exists only to the extent the state dosnt

You could replace the word "communism" in those examples with "democracy." They all claimed to be democratic. Or are you gonna sit here and tell me how the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is a Democratic Republic? And how the People's Republic of China is a Republic?

Yes, you certainly could. Democracy is also a phony bologne trick imo. I am anti-capitalist, anti corporatist, anti-communist, anti-humanist and anti-democracy. I suppose the difference would be the nations claiming to be "democracies", as garbage as it is, don't always devolve into totalitarian hell-holes with starvation, death squads, secret police and forced labor camps. So I will say with confidence it's the lesser of two evils, despite being far, far from perfect.

national-capitalism

Social-Nationalism. Fuck Capitalist swine and their Jewish brethren.

Full socialism for a utopian city, mostly capitalism with some socialism for normal cities

uh… Europe is doing fine.

Full capitalism. Work hard or die of starvation like bitch.

...

Full Capitalism.
It is like Human's version of Natural Selection but since we don't have predators and it is pretty easy even for stupid people to reproduce (Not me though) we need capitalism to be some sort of replacement for that.
Reap what you sow and if you can't suck for you. Die.

are you against a gentile version of national-capitalism?

JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS

>Have your fuedal lord rent out (((private property))) to his people

Yup. Europe is on top of the world.

Right… except a ton of facile weaklings are born with absurd quantities of inherited wealth, which they then use to procure more wealth at the expense of those who have none. The idea that somehow crapitalism weeds out the weak is patently absurd; people can be born borderline retarded (See: Bush family) and still horde more wealth because they were lucky enough to be born into it.

Meanwhile, variously intelligent people are going to have to scrap just to get a degree that let's them maybe, maybe move up to bourgeoisie class if they're lucky. Disgusting.

Attached: 7502af3890c6f44f1e7948dec188219212a513b56c2437b630931623229deb43.png (350x510, 286.75K)

Neither. They're both outdated models. But something closer to Socialism. Capitalism is fucking most of the third and developing world rn

You need to move between both pragmatically. Capitalism is usually better for the long run but eventually winds down and socialism can fix a lot of the issues that arise but socialism usually doesn't last very long before parasites destroy the system.

It's not the system Holla Forums, it's you.
Man up already.

Capitalism with some welfare and worker protections

P U R E
C A P I T A L I S M

A N C A P I S T A N F O R E V E R

Distributism

Socialize industries vital the the prosperity of the nation (resources, utilities, military ect.), capitalism for everything else.
This way you allow social mobility without taxpayers getting jewed into buying shit like the F-35.

Attached: both.jpg (480x360, 14.34K)

Communism
you're welcome

gas yourself first, fucking centrist

Quality argument friend, you sure have well reasoned opinions.

Attached: 1424278074164.png (613x487, 342.88K)

...

This thread is fucking stupid. The answer is both as a sum and neither on an individual scale

Capitalism without socialism is fascism.
Socialism without capitalism is communism.

Neither is anarchy.

That's the fucking trick, that's all there is to it.

Attached: 4vy7s7bttdb01.jpg (1440x1169, 851.54K)

Glad to see you realized saying we have anarchy on the individual level was fucking retarded, other than that I mostly agree.

Capitalism without socialism is fascism.

Socialism without capitalism is communism.

agreed but which of op's remaining options is best?mostly socialism with some capitalism or mostly capitalism with some socialism .

What are you fucking on about. I didn't say that, and we do, and it isn't.

You might want to read the economy part of this PDF. Fascism is a mix of both "capitalism" and "socialism", it's arguable on how socialist the founders of fascism is, but I believe it leans a little bit more towards socialism. But, if it wasn't for the forced polarization of the Democratic system, we wouldn't have any such thing as "left and right wing" ideologies. They'd just be called what they are, communism, fuedalism, capitalism, socialism, etc.

You made two posts and deleted them, I was giving you credit for being able to admit you were wrong by changing it but now you are denying it like a little faggot.
It's a fucking imageboard dude, no need to worry about your rep if you say something stupid.

Attached: Disordnance.webm (320x240, 3.58M)

Check the board logs. It was actually dysnomia who deleted those two previous posts

My mistake, dysnomia really is a useless faggot.

Attached: Serbian_Music.webm (400x224, 938.51K)

You have to be crazy to think this is capitalism without socialism. That PDF really blows that assertion right out of the water tbh.

Attached: 61e74e936b657680aaea489eb9f15330f8d26e64d8d8f782880c966b8e7c7d13.png (467x400, 30.25K)

non state socialism please - libertarian socialism aka anarchism

you are all faggots

except this user