DoJ requests DreamHost to hand over access logs and photos of millions of Trump protesters

a shekel for a good goy

Not any flag, not any signs, not any songs, not any clothes. Those are signs that shows your alignment with others, see also: "gang signs and colors". It's your responsibility to check the credentials of people you follow. You can just brush whatever action you'll partake in with a "I was told I was the good guy fighting the bad guys". But let's go again: an organization with the explicit intent of destabilizing the country forms and creates a set of nodes and delegates organizers. People start to align with this organization, follow their leads, follow their beliefs, enact their policies. They uses symbols to recognize each other like uniforms. These symbols shows your belonging to that organization. Now, you investigate. You have a responsibility for the people you follow. If someone says "hey, follow me, we'll kill bad guys" and you follow, it's your responsibility, you can't just say "I was told they were bad people".
Investigate. Believe it or not, there's a whole organization of people paid to do just that.
Are you just paying attention now? archive.is/8KGx7
And that's all I want.
He was right-wing? How do you reached that conclusion? I'm asking for a friend who cannot recognize antifas.
But no, leftists didn't ram a car into a crowd... recently, "they" (as a whole, right) shot someone in cold blood instead (archive.is/4HUIR, and I'm sure they all concerted before he did so). And call for blood. And destroy things when they manage to shutdown's someone speaking engagement for hate speech, while tagging completely non-hate speech messages on private and public properties. Thanks for paying the $100,000 bill, residents caught in the crossfire.
True, it was an argument to your "massive violation of civil rights". Same setup, same outcome, party's canceled for everyone.

I don't think you understand what a strawman is.

lol

Except antifa isn't like a gang, just like anonymous isn't a gang. You may as well say that anyone wearing a MAGA hat is also in an "organization".
Now you're conflating actions with merely existing as part of an ideological group that has no real organization. I'm all for prosecuting people that actually partake in violence, but that's not what this thread is about, since these people are being surveilled merely for visiting a site.
Well, you lost me at organization. That is something anitfa isn't.
Except the only ones doing the killing this past week weren't antifa, were they? And the woman killed was not wearing black. Was not waving a commie flag, and really seemed like a regular woman. Or is everyone who protests white nationalists antifa?
Because we saw his facebook page and he's been involved in the white nationalist movement. That's a pretty big hint.
The problem is that the DOJ wants surveillance on people merely for visiting a site. This should not be accepted. You don't know that any of them are antifa, and you can't say that antifa is a terrorist organization because the most you seem to manage is saying that certain political ideologies should now be given different treatment than others, no matter their actions.

See, the problem is that you haven't thought through what you are implying. If you're going to say that someone is a terrorist because they are antifa, then define antifa as someone who doesn't seem to be a terrorist, then you can't well claim that these people are terrorists. I know, thinking about shit you say is hard.

What they do is in the name. People regrouping under the same banner isn't a group somehow.
I'm done.

No, because they partake in specific actions that are threatening to everybody involved.

I'm done.

The MSM already does this.
not an argument

the Koch brothers approve this message

You said organization. Just like anonymous is not an organization, neither is antifa.

Then why use signifiers other than actions to decide who to target? Because so far these actions from the DOJ seem to be targeting people because of their beliefs and not their actions. If you're going to define anitfa as only rioters, then every single riot can be blamed on them, and every single person who dresses in black and is a commie fuck might not actually fit your new description of anitfa. Your problem is that you seem in tent, just like the DOJ, in grouping people together that might have nothing to do with each others' actions or lack thereof.

Yes, and the MSM is not a branch of government. They don't have to respect your rights. The DOJ, however, does.

Not an argument is not an argument, especially when it's been explained to you that the DOJ does have a responsibility to respect your rights. Thinking is hard for you, I guess.