Net Neutrality

...

-encode data into human language
-encode data in time
-encode data to multiple facebook users
anyway i highly doubt the internet will become just facebook/twatter, because then someone will just make his own ISP and get all the money. by the way such a cucked internet would have video games, which means even more channels to send information

no. what's the problem?

The CAs control the security of that system and the CAs answer to the government. All regular https traffic could be ordered transparent without disrupting users.
Your childishness is showing though, thinking that because something might affect a lot of people or fuck things up it can't happen. Consider what happened in Iran with the Islamic Revolution.

get cucked by markov chains
get cucked by (((server optimizations))) adding random 0-5 second delay
get cucked by spam filter
terrorism :^)
All new games released on Steam (now owned by Oculus) have integrated their chat functionality into Steam, letting developers use Facebook SmartFilter™ for free, lowering server and moderation costs

Not the user you responded to.
What do you not understand when he says that the ONLY isp is 40 miles away ?
Do you want him to get an ISP which is 100 mile or more ?

I'm saying just by moving around in a game you can encode info. Most modern "AAA" games have about 50 channels you can use, not just chat and physically moving around in the world. And what are you saying, they're only going to have a small list of validated games? If we're going full Sharia law, you really wont care much about having access to a convenient global internet. In any case you can't really filter natural language unless people only have a few deterministic ways they can produce text.

I'm saying if your ISP is "fucking you" it's better to have no ISP instead of paying them to fuck you and complaining to your government like a bitch. inb4 >I need internet to watch netflix tho

They're not going to have a small list of validated games, but all the netcode and chat will be handled by an external library provided by Steam to make P2P easier, since it's quite hard to do right.
Maybe they'll add that too like they did in hearthstone, in-game you have deterministic chat, you can only write text freely with your friends. Nobody is going sharia law, it's not needed. Most autists who care about privacy won't have any other friends who do since they won't have any at all. It's more like Brave new World than the Islamic State.

uhh if there's no Sharia law, there's not going to be any big attempt stop stenography, and from all current news, any attempt to stop steno even by government will be poor.

What I meant by this is, if humans were robots, then it would be easy to filter what they say on facebook, but since natural language is ill defined, constantly evolving, and context dependent, it's probably impossible to filter out data packets stenographed into natural language. You could always go for some heuristic bullshit but if you fuck it up too much nobody will use your service.

what are we even talking about now?

getting more off topic:
when someone says (((external library))), i imagine some bullshit like Planetside 2, where the physics is handled by an external library, and the server has no way of validating your position and movements, so we can fly around and teleport

Facebook will do it to decrease the load on their servers. Try uploading a video encoding large amounts of data on youtube - it's impossible. So the ratio of carrier to signal will be abysmal, which will give you an absolutely terrible data rate if applied to text messaging.

You can use markov chains. Also remember that they have loads and loads of data to train neural networks and the like from.

No, the game creators only write the GUI parts, then they just call steam.chat.send(message, type) and steam.chat.addListener(function).

THEY'RE TRASHING THE FLOW OF DATA
TRASHING
HACK THE PLANET