Text editors

What's weird about Neovim? It's Vim, except cleaner and better.

Vim is the masterrace editor, and OpenBSD is the masterrace UNIX (until illumos gets its act together... if ever).

step it up faggot
document.querySelectorAll('.unimportant > a').forEach(e => e.textContent == 'ClipboardImage.png' && e.closest('.post').remove())

/\b(\w[^\s]*)\1\1/

Anything particularly bad or good about Pluma?

/\!$/Checkmate.

Emacs is a giant clusterfuck of lisp. It's like if web pages had lisp instead of pajeetscript.
jed
busybox vi

...

OP here

top kek


I dunno man, feels somewhat incomplete, although I'm used with vim.

when I mean text editor, I also mean as in some sort of IDE replacement. vim can be extended easily, emacs has already some shortcuts for this, dunno about others.

Neovim can use pretty much all Vim plugins, migrating your settings form Vim to Neovim usually just means renaming the vimrc to init.vim and moving .vim to .config/nvim. Anything you can do in Vim you can also do in Neovim. Well, almost, they removed features that were already broken and useless in the first place and replaced them with better ones.

The only thing that's still kind of flaky are GUIs, I know there is Neovim Qt as the canonical GUI, but I have no idea how well it works. The GUI used to be part of Vim, leading to a number of problems, while in Neovim they removed any notion of GUI and made the GUI essentially another plugin. This makes it possible to cleanly separate things, write the GUI in any framework you want, and you can do cool things that you couldn't in GUI Vim, like the popups in pic related.