No, without a state there would be no easy peaceful way to stop businesses from gaining more power. It actually would make capitalism a more unstoppable force.
Are ancaps useful idiots for real anarchists for abolishing the state?
Isaac Sanchez
Gabriel Davis
...
Gavin Hernandez
Fools. Every one of you that say this. Any thinking man can see that the moneyed powers use government tools to retain their monopoly on money making.
Owen Moore
Like cashfags! (look it up)
Their ideas are consistent and correct as long as you treat private property as an a priori phenomenon. This flawed foundation is where the whole thing breaks down.
Not at all. You cannot hope to dismantle the state without dismantling the property relations which give rise to the state. The NAP, for instance, is a Kantian categorical imperative. Its success as policy is absolutely contingent on everyone advancing it over their own rational self-interest on ideological grounds. Which is a noble, but impractical, notion.
Carter Martin
"an"-caps are the ones that only exist on the internets.
Anarchists actually do something IRL. Am not saying they are by any means effective.. but they exist IRL.
Lincoln Hall
They would just use another apparatus to replace the state. To do the same things the state does (mainly enforce private property). But now, there is no check to help the working people. All the money spent on lobbying to get looser regulation wouldn't be necessary anymore, because they could just do it anyway.
Wyatt Sullivan
An Honest Conversation About Race | Jared Taylor and Stefan Molyneux
Daniel Evans
To be fair Stefan also had Noam Chomsky on and the guys dragged his nuts all over "right anarchism" and Molly basically pretended to agree. I think he might actually figure that when he has talking heads on his audience might actually want to hear what they have to say and they no what parts he disagrees with, so he doesn't have to make a big stink about it in an interview as opposed to a debate.
Hunter Scott
shiggy diggy
Angel Lee
I laff everytime