Yes, of course. Being "Anti Assad" is supporting interventionism in the current situation. The Syrian Communist Party has criticized the government for their beforehand too western oriented policies and blame Assad for being partly at fault for the result, yet they are smarter than some liberal western anarchist armchair revolutionary wankers and the US backed stupid kurdish idiots falling for the imperialists interest to split up antiimperialist forces into interest groups. They are fighting alongside the SAA against reactionaries threatening the secular and independent nation of Syria and western interventionists seeking to install a puppet government for geostrategical reasons.
The Kurds want a country of theirown. US is only backing them as much as it suits them.
The fact that the only solution is going back to the previous state does not mean Assad is "a good guy".
Lincoln Jenkins
see statement of syrian communist party, spare me comments that are already adressed
Aaron Bennett
...
Elijah Hill
Sorry for doublepost, didn't mean it.
By the way I'm only rooting for one team in this whole mess.
Thomas Clark
Socialists are neutral in imperialist war. The conflict between Daesh, Nusra/FSA, and Assad is an imperialist war, of interest only in that it keeps the revolution's enemies shooting at one another.
The conflict between Rojava and the above three, however, is a revolutionary war, and the SDF deserves our complete support.
William Torres
...
Grayson Thomas
That's unless you BECOME the superpower.
Russia had the power. The rest of the world was also in turmoil.
Subjective conditions.
Aaron Collins
OFFICIAL SYRIA POWER RANKING: Kurds>Assad>"Moderate" Rebels> ISIS
Aaron Peterson
Notice how Kurdish borders seem to align almost perfectly with the Jewish "Greater Israel" agenda.
