Do Americans believe this?

Do Americans believe this?

Other urls found in this thread:

boards.4chan.org/d/thread/7592475
edition.cnn.com/2017/07/29/asia/north-korea-intercontinental-ballistic-missile-test/index.html
vox.com/world/2017/7/28/16058494/north-korea-missile-test-new-york-washington
telegraph.co.uk/news/0/far-can-north-korean-missiles-travel/
businessinsider.com/north-korean-nuclear-strike-united-states-arrival-times-2017-8
reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-missiles-usa-assessment-idUSKBN1AG2J4
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I do believe that my country is objectively superior to every other in the world. We started as a colony, gained our independence, and then left to our own devices became the worlds greatest superpower through two world wars and now have the strength to act as world police if we desire. All nonamerican countries are inferior losers who are beneath us.

most Americans are either indifferent or would like to visit there.

I like female on male rape, post more.

Is this bait?

Not an argument.

it isn't rape, it is love

Ah, I see

Yes except for the racist as fuck part. Europe is less racist than us and that's a bad thing. Otherwise, yuropoors can go cry their salty tears in random unrelated threads like they always do and get 100 replies.

...

Reminder your life expectancy is just above that of Cuba.

Now with Kim going crazy it's even lower than that.

What do you mean by this?

Source?
Also, more. Just spam the thread please, it will go to good use.

sorry, I am just not up to it today
just look /gfd/

Kim Jong Un
North Korea

I do, it's dead.

And that lowers your life expectancy how?
Stress?
Or are you saying he's actually going to nuke the US?

Who?

boards.4chan.org/d/thread/7592475

This meme is so rediculously stupid. The furthest a successful launch has gone is the Sea of Japan. I invite any Murrican dipshit to look at a map to see for themselves how much space there still is between there and california. Why are Murricans so stupid? Fluoride? TV?

Thought you meant the board. Thanks, I usually stay off of /d/

It's part of their (((culture)))

I wouldn't mind california being nuked.

California is the only passable state, maybe together with Alaska. Why do Americans hate it so much?

>>>/israel/

Lmao what. Maybe to marxists faggots.

lol Not up to date, are you?
edition.cnn.com/2017/07/29/asia/north-korea-intercontinental-ballistic-missile-test/index.html
They can hit the US.

Nigger, are you really aiming to have this conversation?

fake news

Well, take your pick then:
vox.com/world/2017/7/28/16058494/north-korea-missile-test-new-york-washington
telegraph.co.uk/news/0/far-can-north-korean-missiles-travel/
businessinsider.com/north-korean-nuclear-strike-united-states-arrival-times-2017-8
reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-missiles-usa-assessment-idUSKBN1AG2J4

...

#REKT

The echo chamber is strong in this one.
No wonder the country is becoming a failed state.

Sorry, can't hear you over how hard you just ate shit lololololololololololo

As an American, I'd say our nation is the 2nd best in the world right after Iceland.

It's an individual's choice, for the most part. Sure there are exceptions but those who live healthily tend to live longer and live happier than those that don't. Don't blame our nation for it.


Of course I will admit we are subject to propaganda in this country and the worried state of this user is an example of the result. Although I'd say every country has propaganda of some sort so we aren't unique in this at all. A simple fix is to throw away your television and get your news and mindless entertainment off of the internet. You have a lot more choice and can even block ads.


I said, that's propaganda.

shill

*As I said

I think America would win in a war with NK.
Stating facts, their nukes can reach America already.

This is what Americaans believe

t. tard

lol the fear that keeps them feeling safe. LOL!!

Why was this post deleted?

Cuck

...

Oh yeah I agree. Even if we get i a war with them I wouldn't be concerned at all. My only caveat is to let the South Koreans and other nations in the area handle the ground fighting while we provide air and naval support, I don't want our boys, and especially not our girls, who in my opinion shouldn't be allowed on the front lines anyway but what are you going to do right, to get bogged down any more than they have to. The continuation of the war in Afghanistan is bad enough.

My post was deleted? That's odd and frustrating I did nothing wrong. Thanks for screen-capping it user.

you just have to kick a ball
how can americans not understand that?

The women in the military should die as an example for any others who would think about joining. Why the fuck would you want them not to be allowed on the front lines? They want to be treated like men, let them die like men.

Because they shouldn't be treated like men in the first place. They shouldn't have the same responsibilities men do nor should men have the same responsibilities women do. I don't personally like the idea of making those women suffer because their society lied to them. i believe if most women honestly sat down and thought about they would prefer the life of a house-wife. I mean, there would be exceptions of course and if capable those women should be allowed to follow their non-marital dreams and even housewives can do so as a side goal to what should be their primary one, being a good wife to their husband, which can come in many forms, and ensuring that their children have a loving feminine presence growing up. It's a mans duty to fight for his nation, first and women's job to support that fight. Of course, if push comes to shove we can and should allow for leniency in that but only then. Although I can understand your view given that we currently have equal rights under the law with women, but I don't agree with such blanket "rights" anyway.

Obviously they shouldn't be there in the first place but while they are there, they can provide usefulness as an example so that history doesn't repeat itself. I have a 1 drop rule.

It all went downhill when they got to vote.

Agreed. Although I don't think anyone should be just given the vote, the should prove themselves worthy of it. This goes for both men and women of all races and creeds and the requirements to get the vote should be the same for all of them. Although I myself haven't really come up with much in the way of what metrics we should go by. Having an intelligence that's at least above average should probably be a prat of it but that's as far as I've gotten. If a woman can pass whatever test or meet whatever requirements are considered necessary, then she should be given the franchise. Of course the requirements/test as I've said before should be the same for all and stay that way no matter what. So there would be no lowering of standards for anyone to get more of certain demographics in, nor would there be higher standards for anyone to try to block certain demographics out. Ultimately the majority of the enfranchised in such a system would be white males, and we would achieve this without blocking out individuals of other demographics who deserve it and blocking out those white men who would be poor voters. In my opinion that is the best way to get out of our current situation, not just denying or giving the franchise to blanket demographics but doing it meritocraticly.

I wouldn't vote personally, there should definitely be restrictions on who should have the ability to though.

You sound like a gigantic fucking cunt. But I'll agree that some kind of test is starting to make more and more sense, given our current administration.

Most of it varies from individual to individual, OP, but almost all Americans believe the last sentence fully even if the don't believe any of the rest of it.

Beyond just restrictions on who can vote, I'll also add that their needs to be a ban on corporations, non-profits, trade unions and other groups making political donations. The decision made for Citizens United vs. FEC needs to be reversed, at least on the Federal and State level. There should always be a limit on how much a single person can donate to anything having to do with political campaigns and politics in general, as well. None of that "Super-PAC" bullshit. We should also have a test and/or a set of requirements one has to go through/meet before they can donate as well, for that is also a path to influencing policy. Do those things as well and we're well on the way to fixing a lot of the issues we currently have and probably creating several new unforeseen and foreseen problems. We can only hope that their will be less when we undergo these changes and not the same amount or even more.

Shut the fuck up and suck on my american dick.

Nobody should ever be told what he can or can not do with his lawfully owned money.

It happened before, when they opened voting rights to all males instead of just tax payers. Then they let in euro-socialists in late 1800s and early 1900s. White women actually vote decent, especially the married ones. It's all the minorities and welfare parasites that fuck things up.

Into the trash this degenerate whore goes.

If it affects the policies of the nation I live in, then I have no reason to give a flying fuck what you think your "rights" are. As long as you can't use it to affect the politics of my country, I really don't give a shit how much money you have, but unfortunately people and not just (((people))) can't be trusted to not intervene in the lives of other if they have the opportunity. I mean generally you're right but there are exceptions and this is one of them.

lol no
the 53% for Trump is largely a fluke and was driven by the facts that Hillary was utterly irredeemable, Trump was promising them the security they crave so much, and nothing makes a bitch angrier than seeing a bigger bitch get ahead.

If you have the luxury of rebuilding the country, do not, and I mean DO NOT let women vote. Ever. No matter HOW HARD THEY WHINE. NEVER FUCKING EVER AGAIN. I don't care what color they are, I don't care how redpilled they claim to be, UNDER NO CONDITIONS SHOULD A WOMAN EVER BE ALLOWED TO VOTE.

It's called freedom, if you don't like it then fuck off to brazil, commie faggot.

Being a tax payer is another requirement that should've never been removed. It's an excellent filter for worthless scum and it helps keep the government focused on things other then just satisfying the gibs-me-dats.

Yet that freedom tramples on my freedom and the freedom of every other person in the nation. We need to cull some freedoms, otherwise everyone will lose all of their freedoms. I sure as hell ain't a fucking commie, but I realize that certain freedoms need to be given up to maintain our freedom. Should I be able to murder or steal? I mean you clearly like private property, I do too, but you being able to keep that private property in your possession is much easier of a task when you have laws restricting the freedom of others to take it. Beyond that there's already restrictions on how much you can give in this country for most political contributions, but there are some which you can just give an unlimited amount to. This destroys the political abilities of everybody who can't afford to give as much as Bill Gates and his peers and I doubt you're amongst them.

The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. If you don't like what someone is using their hard earned money for, use your own money and/or spread knowledge to people around so they can make the best informed decisions.

Also, to this, tough fucking shit. Life isn't fair and that's capitalism. There are winners and losers, we don't all get to make the same amount of money like some commie utopia.

this, plus we're still sane enough to not throw someone into prison for saying mean things on twitter for now

You could say the same exact thing about Somalia and the price of your life during the civil war. I'd rather give up some freedoms so I don't have to spend time worrying about things like that. Now I'm not saying I want to ignore the issues in that regard, that's a path to total tyranny, but if we had to worry about everything in existence, we'd have no free time. It's much better to outsource things like that. Not completely, of course, but somewhat at least

Yes when the plebs storm into the mansions of the rich because they're unrepresented and some actual commie gets into power because there were no restrictions upon the influence the rich had, I'm sure they'll be saying tough shit too. Look, I believe hierarchies can be a force for good in the world, but there needs to be both a cultural sense of noblesse oblige and one enshrined in the code of law to an extant that is decided by the elites themselves, but there should damn well be something. This isn't just moralfaggotry either but it would be pragmatic on the part of the elites to do so as to draw the potential power base of revolutionary upstarts away from said upstarts.

To be honest both Western European countries and the whole of North America is pretty shit. In an attempt to distance ourselves from "atrocities" committed over the course of our history we allow minorites to disrespect our people and culture, flood our countries and claim them for their own, breed us out and so forth. Its now to a point in which there is an entire following of white people who are either mindless, weak, or trying to profit from killing off and degrading their own. People who normally would have been killed off or starved out now have the ability to demand change to accomodate their inability to succeed in the rough, violent, and labor rewarded cultures of our ancestors. The sad thing is is that we could have put a stop to it, but idiotic concepts of freedom to ruin your community have been put into place as a knee jerk reaction to the totalitarian policies of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany.

There is no one thing you can point to and say "This is where it went bad." It was a gradual process caused by small, vague, seemingly unnoticable things over the past two centuries that led to this destruction of values and commodity found in absolute stupidity and hypocrisy.