Sure, I don't need ultra details, just a rough overview
A Peculiar Response from a Supposed "Insider" (New Chronology)
Robert Peterson
Jackson Murphy
how do i contact you?
Josiah Moore
You can do so via email.
> [email protected]/* */
Are you the actual author?
Henry Clark
no just a fan
Landon Cruz
Damn
Charles Thompson
No you aren't understanding how radiocarbon dating even fucking works. They only know the age of certain carbon atoms because they used a base sample, i.e. An artifact that everyone trusts to be dated is the baseline. So if some stupid shit everyone agrees is the baseline because of fucked up chronology, the whole system needs reworking. That's why Fomenkos went into statistical analysis of historical biographies etc. There are fucking tenured professors in the field of mathematics from all over the world who have verified the math behind fomenkos disproving the current accepted chronology. That means yes everything we know about historical timelines up until a certain point is a fabrication. This doesn't mean his attempt to reconstruct history is correct through, but he may be on to something.
Owen Russell
The moon landings never happened. If they did, there would be a scientific record. Instead, we are left with many scientific anomalies, such as:
Why was there no radiation damage on any of the photos?
Why don't the dosimeters of the astronauts agree with known modern estimates?
Why does the Plss never show evidence of venting water vapour?
How likely is it that a rocket could dock with module in orbit going 2400 mph with no accidents, 6 times in a row, using no more computing power than a couple floppy disks?
Why don't we have better technology that allows us to return to the moon? Yknow, following the normal model of technological progress?
And on and on it goes…
Dismissing the "moon hoax" without even looking into the issue is unintelligent.
Lincoln Russell
My mind would be blown if this turns out true. Aren't all the source NT manuscripts verifiably older than all the source OT manuscripts?
Ethan Adams
No, I do, and I'm saying it's all irrelevant if the only thing you need to do is check if one item is older than another without determining the actual age. The relevant question is not how old the Dead Sea Scrolls are, but whether they are definitely older than the time you claim OT was written.
Jack Thompson
The problem is that they didn't have digital libraries back then, so everything got transcribed as the original manuscripts got worn out. Dead Sea Scrolls were preserved incredibly well and they're still just fragments.
I heard a story about some hipster who came into an antique bookstore and asked about a manuscript from 11th century. Pic related is how about everyone in the bookstore looked.