Hi Holla Forums. Very recently I was in HalfChan talking with a supposed individual claiming he was an insider. Long story short, I had an exchange with this insider in a sort of AMA back and forth. One of my very last questions that I asked was with regards to the Roman Empire. Specifically what he thought of it in terms of its societal structure.
His response….was….quite shocking for me. He told me that the Roman Empire as I knew it does not exist and is merely a fabrication. He then pointed me to someone called Anatoly Fomenko and his theory of New Chronology (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Chronology_(Fomenko)).
When I read that wiki page linked above for the first time I completely dismissed it as complete and utter horse shit. However, since then I have begun digging deeper into Fomenko's research and there may actually be some merit into his work….which makes this so scary considering the implications here. Guys like chess master Gary Kasparov also have indicated in the past that there is a lot of merit to his work.
In the next post(s) I'll highlight some things with regards to this theory and some of the most fascinating implications that are brought forth.
This thread is meant to be a discussion on New Chronology, wether it has merits or not and to jot down the thoughts of Anons who perhaps have been more exposed to this subject than I have.
Perhaps what makes this subject os intriguing is the fact that Anatoly Fomenko himself is a mathematician.
In order to prove his theory one of his principal methods of determining wether the chronology that we have been all taught at face value is false is through the calculations of solar eclipses. Solar eclipses, as you may guess, are very important events and were even more so during the past and were recorded in great detail. When you run through the calculations of when such eclipses occurred and you try to overlay that with the knowledge that we have you get an interesting result. Namely…that what has been recorded in the history books and what is actually calculated DO NOT MATCH!
Additionally, Fomenko does a lot of statistical work on historical writings. He has determined that a number of events have been recorded more than once and he calls these events "phantom copies" of one another (see related image). Those would be duplicates of one another.
The next post will deal with the really fantastical part and some of the conclusions that Fomenko draws upon.
Angel Brown
Fomenko claims all events and characters conventionally dated earlier than 11th century are fictional, and represent "phantom reflections" of actual Middle Ages events and characters, brought about by intentional or accidental mis-datings of historical documents.
Here are some direct claims:
Mason Brooks
Go on, I'm interested
Adam Anderson
Your either a fool, or a shill trying to spread another conspiracy theory here.
Justin Long
What is interesting is that if you know some of the history behind Martin Luther you will know that in the very beginning Luther accused the papacy of committing forgery on a number of religious texts.
Another interesting fact is that much of the historical documents of the ancient world (namely those of Ancient Rome and Ancient Egypt) were discovered / compiled in the Middle Ages by clergy and other members of the Catholic Church. This is around the same time that we get the BC - AD chronology (also given to us by Catholic Church).
If Fomenko is correct, then it means the Medici Family…who at the time owned the BIGGEST BANK in all of Europe had a lot to do with the corruption or sometimes the out-right falsification of a lot of these documents.
Dude call it whatever the hell you want but there is something here. I initially dismissed this as bullshit as well but the more I look into it the more peculiar things I find.
Luke Myers
Can you at least try harder…. Kikes are truly subhuman.
Grayson Foster
What is there exactly?
There isn't a single shred of evidence offered, which is impossible, because it's completely mental.
Justin King
I have been wanting to read it. Seems at least plausible.
