The author of the article makes the distinction
I stumbled across this piece from Paul Elam's site; a testimony from a self-described "Left-wing Anti-Feminist" that...
Paul Elam is an opportunist. He only cares about the men's rights movement insofar as it makes him money. Other parts of the movement range from hating him for bringing in traditionalist shitters to tolerating him for providing a platform. I don't think there's anyone left who actually likes him aside from the right-wing rubes he pandered to to make more money.
I understand its like talking to a brick wall comrade but someone has to try debating with them. Otherwise they'll think they're in good company.
you said nothing
your claims are just as out of touch with reality as the person that wrote the article
he says the right/left are obsolete which is just neoliberal bullshit
sorry for making you waste your time on your phone but i really don't want to argue about this irrelevant text
A debate implies they'll change their views.
Stop posting then. Don't you need to go get your dick cut off or something?
Nonwhites in the first world are also starting to see that the liberal status quo doesn't really give a fuck about them.
The "worst" demographic would be Caucasian women.
What exactly did I claim? I simply answered your questions about the article. I guess "debating" was a poor choice of words. I hardly no how my views or the views of the author are out of date. You yourself like to make a lot of bold claims for someone not trying to argue. Like I said it's like talking to a brick wall.