So for Trump to become King in substance, and eventually King in name, he has to seize the power to fire the fireproof.
Which, given that he has support from the military, the praetorians, the cops, the rentacops, and the mercenaries, and that judges do not have much support from anyone, is quite doable.
If Trump says “You are fired”, and security frog marches the offending presidency bureaucrat out of the building and does not let him back in, has that bureaucrat not been fired?
If HR attempts to keep paying the bureaucrat, apply the same measure to HR. If judges rule the firing illegal, do like Abbot and Duterte, and tell the judges to take a long walk off a short pier.
Ryder Diaz
Thus could Trump exercise the power of Kings.
And if he wants to build a wall and deport anchor babies, that is what he needs to do, he needs to exercise the power of a King, for otherwise the presidency will not permit the president to act.
And if Trump exercises the power of Kings and does so competently and bravely, if he is worthy to exercise such power, Kings shall in due course ensue. I will then apply for the job of Grand Inquisitor when the time is right.
Fuck no. Wouldn't that mean a we'd have Jewish heirs?
Juan Adams
Trump could potentially turn people against the legislature as well if they block him. He doesn't seem like the sort of man to go "well I tried but those gosh darn congressmen won't let me follow through!"
Trump will pull a Caesar God willing
Ethan Brown
Where in our history have we seen such a government ? Feudalism - in Middleval Europe. And if history is a good indicator of where things will go, think of Trump as a king who wants to become an absolute monarch and obsolete the feudal lords.
I humbly submit to his rule and look forward to unify our nation in the name of making America great again.
Joseph Sanders
America already has the only king it needs, and his throne isn't here.
John Ortiz
That's how it was meant to be, but the jews subverted that one. It's not enough. You need a local Jesus, down on earth.
Jonathan Martinez
Yes it is. The Founding Fathers fucked up by being too blinded by the French Revolution LARP to realize that individualism for it's own sake is worthless, and for assuming that it was so obvious that America should only ever admit and give citizen status to white Christians of good standing and merit that they didn't need to write it down in the opening line.
We don't need a fucking king. We need a system that will allow nature's aristocracy to rise naturally to the top, and instill in them the virtues and traditions that support and sustain society, so the nation-state will always have sincere and virtuous defenders to protect it.
Write what you're forbidding in bold, loud letters at the very top, instead of hoping your culture can survive white ideas and freedoms being given to Jews and niggers.
You need to scribe, in big bold letters right across the top, that liberty must be coupled with duty to family, people, and nation to mean anything, that the voluntary service of free men is the lifeblood of the republic, and that the state must remain culturally and ethnically pure. "Only white Christian Europeans can legally immigrate and be citizens with rights" needs to be written on a giant sign right outside the door, instead of being put in a back page of a legal document most people don't know about for lawyers to play with. Only white people who are Christians in good standing can be Americans didn't survive the muh feels and muh based nergo after the Civil War. Why? Because it wasn't carved in stone from the outset like it should have been.
The Founders assumed the best in men. Fuck that. Now we're going to assume the worst, and re-write what they wrote in the original spirit and intention of it, with that base assumption of the worst in mind.
You can take your Antichrist bullshit and feed it feet-first into a wood chipper, kike.
