This is an outline of how President Trump might well become King Trump the first, if we are sufficiently lucky and virtuous.
The world is sick of anarcho tyranny, and hungers unknowingly for the power and authority of Kings.
The recent election of Duterte, on a platform of his praetorians simply killing the bad guys out of hand without charges or trials, is an example of this hunger.
Other urls found in this thread:
blog.jim.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Now I hear some of you saying (and the progressives thinking but not saying out loud) that apart from being tough on crime, corruption, and governmental indiscipline, Duterte is a leftist and that is just a bunch of rice niggers, low IQ south Asians. White people are more civilized than that – perhaps a little too civilized for our own good.
In Australia, one of the whitest countries remaining, a few elections back, the election was on the issue of illegal immigration. Tony Abbott said he would stop illegal immigration.
The judges, of course, ruled stopping illegal immigration illegal. Tony Abbott ignored the judges. The net effect is that today, if you violate immigration law they send you to jail in Villawood detention center without bothering with charges or trials. From time to time the left whines about due process, and gets absolutely zero traction. Suddenly it was revealed that there is zero support for due process, that there are almost no voters who care about due process any more. And in particular and especially very few white voters who care about due process.
The judges, of course, ruled stopping illegal immigration illegal. Tony Abbott ignored the judges. The net effect is that today, if you violate immigration law they send you to jail in Villawood detention center without bothering with charges or trials. From time to time the left whines about due process, and gets absolutely zero traction. Suddenly it was revealed that there is zero support for due process, that there are almost no voters who care about due process any more. And in particular and especially very few white voters who care about due process.
The purpose of due process was supposedly to ensure that the innocent do not go to jail, and the guilty do go to jail. But anarcho tyranny means that with so many laws, the innocent are bound to be guilty of something or other, while actual criminals are deemed the oppressed, and are coddled and protected by the state. Due process lets real criminals loose, mostly dark skinned real criminals who prey on white people, while imposing enormous and impossible legal costs on innocent middle class honest respectable people. For middle class people, due process is just the government’s way of punishing you when it cannot be bothered finding a crime to convict you of, even though with so many laws you have undoubtedly committed more crimes than you can shake a stick at.
White people just don’t like due process any more, for much the same reasons as Filipinos rejected it.
So in our current environment due process and judicial review is discredited, and lacks political support. In Tony Abbot’s Australia as much as in Duterte’s Philippines, it was suddenly and startlingly revealed that judges are simply all out of moral authority. No one cares about due process, because, under anarcho tyranny, there is no reason why they should care. It is not just a tiny handful of reactionary intellectuals thinking like this. It is pretty much everyone.
The point of due process was to prevent the King from treating repectable decent people like criminals. But now that we are all treated like criminals, people just don’t care.
Power divided can be power reduced. If the benevolent party controls all the food, or ninety nine percent of the food, as in communist China, today’s Venezuela, or Allende’s Chile, then you are toast. The result is at best severe oppression as in Venezuela, at worst mass murder on an enormous scale, as in China.
If however ninety nine percent of the food is controlled by ninety nine members of the one percent each of whom controls one percent of the food, then no problem. In this case, power divided is power reduced.
But if you need ninety nine approvals by ninety nine bureaucrats to build a house, you are more than ninety nine times as oppressed than if you need the approval of one bureaucrat, because you face a coordination problem between bureaucrats.
With one bureaucrat, you could hope to pay him off, formally or informally, by giving his bagman/consultant, say, a third of the surplus value you create by building the house. With ninety nine bureaucrats, they each want ten percent, so you just cannot build the house.
In this case, power divided is power increased, enormously increased. This enormous multiplication of oppressive power is another aspect of anarcho tyranny that leads people to hunger for the power of kings, they hunger for one man who could say “give me half the surplus value and build it” and who would tell the other ninety eight bureaucrats to take a long walk off a short pier. They hunger for a Duterte who would shoot the other ninety eight bureacrats behind a shed.
America’s smartest member of the ruling progressive elite tells us:
Larry the prog worries that regulation, a multiplicity of veto players, makes government inefficient, and therefore unpopular, worries that he cannot get the bridge he needs to go to and from Harvard, and fails to see the glaringly obvious, that regulation makes the private sector inefficient.
I, too, have had to deal with a multiplicity of veto players, each with his bagman collecting his bribe.
And I do not believe that any of them were reasonable. That is just Larry the prog issuing the required pieties. All of them deserve to be shot. All of them were evil, corrupt, and insane.
Larry is pissed because his commute to Harvard is obstructed, blissfully unaware that Americans further from the seat of power suffer from the anarchy of government far more severely than he does.
In America, the presidency has gathered to itself enormous power, intervening in every small business, every household.
Husbands are thrown out of their houses, fathers torn from their children, thanks to the Department of Justice, which is theoretically answerable to the president. Women with husbands tend to vote Republican. Children with fathers tend to vote Republican. If the Depart of Justice has its way no woman will have a husband, nor any child a father.
Similarly the department of Justice arranged for white people to be burned out of Ferguson, forbidding the Ferguson police from protecting people and property, and forbidding collective self defense against collective aggression.
But the presidency is not the president. It is an enormous horde of bureaucrats that are theoretically supposed to obey the president, but which the president cannot fire, which results in anarcho tyranny. If the president could fire them, this would enormously increase the power of the president, but enormously decrease the power of the presidency, because one would be merely subject to one tyrant, instead of ninety nine tyrants.
yes but what does this have to do with anime
In practice, the bureaucrats tend to treat the president as their public relations boy, rather than their boss. And if he fails to run good PR for what they have already decided to do they will smack him around the ears in the pages of the New York Times.
The bureaucrats are answerable to the consensus of their fellow bureaucrats, they have to be a square peg in a square hole, but the consensus is controlled by the consensus of the Ivies, and the consensus of the Ivies is controlled by the consensus of Harvard.
And as we have seen Harvard does not much like Trump, and to judge from his list of Supreme Court judicial candidates, Trump does not much like Harvard.
For Trump to rule, for Trump to accomplish any of his goals, the president has to subjugate the presidency, a process that will inevitably require massive firings, and some actual violence against those who decline to be fired. Quite possibly some Duterte style sudden violent deaths that no one is inclined to investigate because everyone knows what an honest investigation would reveal.
Trump will need to get rid of some turbulent priests.
The president’s power is so very great as to diminish the power and effectiveness of democracy thus we see a tendency to dynasties – the attempted Kennedy dynasty, the attempted Clinton dynasty, and the Bush dynasty.
An enormous increase in the power of the president, which will happen if Trump succeeds in firing those bureaucrats who do not obey him, would pretty much guarantee dynastic rule. Trump would govern for eight years, then be succeeded by his sons.
So we would have a system that was nominally democratic, but actually hereditary and monarchic. Such a difference between actual and formal power is necessarily corrupting and destructive, because such government operates by lies. To remedy this corruption, one of Trump’s sons would have to declare himself King Trump the third, and his predecessors King Trump the first and King Trump the second.
So for Trump to become King in substance, and eventually King in name, he has to seize the power to fire the fireproof.
Which, given that he has support from the military, the praetorians, the cops, the rentacops, and the mercenaries, and that judges do not have much support from anyone, is quite doable.
If Trump says “You are fired”, and security frog marches the offending presidency bureaucrat out of the building and does not let him back in, has that bureaucrat not been fired?
If HR attempts to keep paying the bureaucrat, apply the same measure to HR. If judges rule the firing illegal, do like Abbot and Duterte, and tell the judges to take a long walk off a short pier.
Thus could Trump exercise the power of Kings.
And if he wants to build a wall and deport anchor babies, that is what he needs to do, he needs to exercise the power of a King, for otherwise the presidency will not permit the president to act.
And if Trump exercises the power of Kings and does so competently and bravely, if he is worthy to exercise such power, Kings shall in due course ensue. I will then apply for the job of Grand Inquisitor when the time is right.
Bump for emperor
Fuck no. Wouldn't that mean a we'd have Jewish heirs?
Trump could potentially turn people against the legislature as well if they block him. He doesn't seem like the sort of man to go "well I tried but those gosh darn congressmen won't let me follow through!"
Trump will pull a Caesar God willing
Where in our history have we seen such a government ? Feudalism - in Middleval Europe. And if history is a good indicator of where things will go, think of Trump as a king who wants to become an absolute monarch and obsolete the feudal lords.
I humbly submit to his rule and look forward to unify our nation in the name of making America great again.
America already has the only king it needs, and his throne isn't here.
That's how it was meant to be, but the jews subverted that one. It's not enough. You need a local Jesus, down on earth.
Yes it is. The Founding Fathers fucked up by being too blinded by the French Revolution LARP to realize that individualism for it's own sake is worthless, and for assuming that it was so obvious that America should only ever admit and give citizen status to white Christians of good standing and merit that they didn't need to write it down in the opening line.
We don't need a fucking king. We need a system that will allow nature's aristocracy to rise naturally to the top, and instill in them the virtues and traditions that support and sustain society, so the nation-state will always have sincere and virtuous defenders to protect it.
Write what you're forbidding in bold, loud letters at the very top, instead of hoping your culture can survive white ideas and freedoms being given to Jews and niggers.
You need to scribe, in big bold letters right across the top, that liberty must be coupled with duty to family, people, and nation to mean anything, that the voluntary service of free men is the lifeblood of the republic, and that the state must remain culturally and ethnically pure. "Only white Christian Europeans can legally immigrate and be citizens with rights" needs to be written on a giant sign right outside the door, instead of being put in a back page of a legal document most people don't know about for lawyers to play with. Only white people who are Christians in good standing can be Americans didn't survive the muh feels and muh based nergo after the Civil War. Why? Because it wasn't carved in stone from the outset like it should have been.
The Founders assumed the best in men. Fuck that. Now we're going to assume the worst, and re-write what they wrote in the original spirit and intention of it, with that base assumption of the worst in mind.
You can take your Antichrist bullshit and feed it feet-first into a wood chipper, kike.
This. This is exactly what we need.
Can we just elect you and get this shit done with already? Lmao.
We need Holla Forumsacks to get in power, quickly. Like (((sanders))) called for yesterday for his commie kike buddies, except for us. We Holla Forumsacks need to rise up and get into the political system, infiltrate it and bring it down from within and replace it with our system. The system we all know deep down is right and true.
SO MUCH RPing IT HURTS
You're conflating the concepts of soft despotism with due process. Due process is one of the reasons this nation was founded.
Applied to illegal immigrants? Perhaps not necessary considering that they are not citizens.
In regard to seizing power for the current cunts? A complete waste of time.
However you can't just throw due process out the window. There's many criminal cases these days where due process doesn't play out -recent examples are a cop being locked up indefinitely for not decrypting a HDD which is suspected to contain cheesy pizza without definitive proof and the no-fly & terrorist watch lists- revealing how necessary a process is.
Also, although it's just political ERP at this point to claim Trump is going to try to be king, it'd likely be a saving grace for this country if we did have a King with conservative American values.
Saged, because I don't bump RP threads.
For shame, OP
the king would be Eric, not his daughter's kid.
what could possibly go wrong?
First born child would be the heir apparent so it would be Trump Jr not Eric, then his first born and so forth. If Jr had no children and died then it would go to Eric.
...
OP is a fucking cuck.
Learn definitions of words please.
Don Jr. has a male heir with an aryan woman. The royal line is well established.
?
The origin of Trump's name - en.wikipedia.org
CAN'T STOP IT NOW
Typical christcuck: obstruct real solutions with platitudes about the Jews' lord.
INRI, you treasonous piece of shit.
The Philippines and Australia are admiralty created (blue flag) jurisdictions. You can't pull this shit in the US or Canada, which are a mix.
((( en.wikipedia.org
Oy vey, goyim, if you elect Trump then the world will be ruled by him.
Newsflash sunshine: it is now. Look into the backgrounds of every president, you will find royal blood.
t. Habsburg
Come on, let's be realistic here.
They get that way because they accept the boat court jurisdiction. Never stand under the kikes pretend boat jurisdiction.