And that he's a Jew that cries about the Shoah at least once a week and talks up Jewish over representation as a facet of their superior IQ even though he's been presented with the data disproving this argument.
In his latest call-in show there was a nigger concerned about having a mixed race child with a Ukrainian and he talked the nog right out of that concern, encouraging the race-mixing.
He's totally Holla Forums-tier guise!
"Equality of outcome". He still believes in equality. He takes it a lot further than most Leftists and explicitly associates "Western Civilization" with Universalism.
His way of thinking is just inherently Jewish and anyone who thinks this guy is "red-pilled' are themselves newfags that aren't red-pilled.
100% true. It was the most recent call-in show. It's worse than that as she self-identifies as a "shitlord" and is obviously circling the alt-right (probably on reddit or twitter). So this is someone he picked out of his many potential calls to hold up as a mascot for his Universalist "right-wing" nonsense. Look niggers can be alt-right too!
Socrates said that the preeminent role of the State was securing the purity of the race. Molyneux constantly shit-talks Socrates/Plato.
Leftist thought since the 50s at last has been characterized by a study of power structures. They are transparently successful and their theories in this realm are very obviously correct.
Molyneux's worldview is built on a defunct Virtue Ethics Theory wherein you try to convert the whole world into believing a single universal creed, which will never work and never has. Certainly not 'voluntarily'.
The Left accepted the fact that you can't change everyone's mind and ultimately its' not even important to do so if you understand the underlying power structures, take advantage of them and turn them to your purposes.
The Left understands that people aren't actually individuals and will act collectively, adopting the ideas of others and acting as the extension of the will of not only more prominent leaders but to institutions. That the great mass of people's "speech" is just bird song and if you transplant a group of birds who know a different song to an isolated island the birds there will all eventually all sing the same song. The noises that come out of people's mouths though resembling language is just an example of monkey see, monkey do. The vast majority of people will never have an original thought and receive their ideas from trusted institutions which are largely defined symbolically and hold symbolic authority. If you control the institutions you can teach the flock to sing any song you want.
The idea that you can destroy in the mind of the human species the power of symbolic authority or the concept of authority by spreading a new morality among the people that forces them to be merely (((individuals))) is categorically a brain dead approach and a quasi-religious, fanatically anti-scientific approach. This is Molyneux's approach in his war on "coercion" and its' supposed immorality.
If everyone were an individual large scale social cooperation would be impossible as the sheer number of possible ideas that exist in response to any one subject that would have to be hashed out to reach a consensus is so staggering that it would make activity sclerotic in the extreme.
Many biological mechanisms exist that subvert the individual will, and many so-called "cognitive biases" are actually adaptive and the people who exhibit them are more successful. To Molyneux none of this matters because it would all be "immoral" anyway and should be opposed based on those grounds. In the same way that inequality is factually the state of mankind and the Left says that this is immoral and should be opposed anyway. As such he's just another stripe Leftist raving against Human Nature.
It's actually because he's biologically Jewish.
