A New Archetype for the Ages

Jesus christ OP, you may as well start namefagging and tripfagging for how much attention whoring you're doing.

No you nigger its the battle of Platea.
Battle of marathon was about 20 years before and was between greece and Darius of persia. In the battle of Platea its Darius's son, Xerxes

It's not attention whoring you're just talking. You fucking angry mudblood kike.

It's best to read "Satan Speaks" for insight into where he was coming from and what his real life thoughts where and then "The Satanic Bible" if you are still interested and haven't rejected what he's about. See if you can find somewhere to download a free pdf of them. Anton is dead so he hardly needs the money anymore.

You are not incorrect though. There are many who just use it for shock value and make their whole lives revolve around it, which is ironically not something LaVey recommended (see Satan Speaks).

I mean strongman in the Anthropological sense, a person among the tribe who wields great power through his prestige and system of alliances but who cannot by himself compel anyone to follow him (i.e. "do what I say or I will personally kill you by myself").

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_man_(anthropology)

I am not very familiar with critical theory.


Jesus may or may not have existed. But the Roman emperor who brought Christianity to prominence did (Constantine?).

It is chicken and egg in the sense that both need each other in order for the other to exist/flourish. It was my way of saying that going on about which leads to which is a dead end and rather pointless line of thought.

A strongman without a prime belief system to lead the masses can only hope to enjoy a short reign and be forgotten by history. A prime belief system without a strongman (or perhaps champion would be a better term) can only hope to languish in obscurity with a small cabal of followers.