Question about WW2 Pacific Front

Why is it that there are much less people who openly do revisionist stuff and/or try to give more insight on the Japanese side of the WW2 story? Exactly why do fewer folks go on the defense of the Japanese on a serious level on what is said to have happened to many areas of China, Indonesia, Malaysia, the city-state of Singapore, Burma, The Andaman islands, Thailand, and parts of the island of New Guinea during the war,as opposed to the many tens of figures who dared to risk their reputation by questioning the HolyCo$t and contesting the fairness of the Nuremberg trials?

Other urls found in this thread:

web.archive.org/web/20080413021822/http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4244
wrmea.org/1999-march/growing-intolerance-threatens-the-humane-jewish-tradition.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

bitch pls, every single Japanese person denies that Japan did anything wrong ever

I don't think so. It is indeed true that many Japanese schools, especially Public schools, do at most marginal touching on WW2, and they indeed should stop being in a state of denial. But saying that nobody who is Japanese believes what was done by their Military in China, Malaysia, and Singapore is just inaccurate! There needs to be more coverage of WW2 in Japanese public schools as well as more of them willing to swallow their pride and learn to look at the Pacific theater in the face and say "we accept our mistakes." But I am at least a couple bits curious as to the extent of what their military at the time did and did not actually do to inhabitants of place like Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand.

Asian culture is a lies based culture, thats all, a guy fucking his imouto will judge and call degenerate a dude doing the same.

Because the evidence supports Japans atrocities being factual while there is a lot of evidence against the official holocaust numbers.

Japanese Jews did nothing wrong

Because Japanese nationalism is basically dead. I mean, German nationalism is dead too but their ethnic brothers in the USA and UK do a good job of looking at history from the other sides perspective.

But with Japs, Americans instantly moved in and planted cock right in their ass and tried to make them America part 2. Didn't happen but American work ethic and business practice of the 40s and 50s became the standard of what a Jap man should be like.

That's my take, gosh I wish I could meet a Japanese nationalist.

They're too busy fucking rubber child sex dolls

...

/this

Fun fact, a event about vr porn has more people than tape related.

considering the Japanese governing body now has the majority of nationalists who wish to restore the old empire I think we might see a true rise in Japanese nationalism

and they now have the numbers to revise the Japanese constitution.

though if they do we will likely just fuck them in the ass before they can do anything.

But hey, whatevs.

Are you aware the Yakuza is extremely nationalist?

is that why like half of them are Koreans?

...

yakuza bushido af

oh shit, looks like I mixed up Koreans and burakumin

kolea mastel lace , we bukkakke wapanese bulakumin

no you faggot
demoralization is no good for anyone

Hipocresy is better… for propaganda, if you assume that every non nip is a tard.

WUT

...

I think you mean 'yellow guilt'

WTF!? How the fuck is it collective guilt if one recognizes that one isn't born perfect, and mistakes happen? Also this thread IS NOT about the European theater and the debates surrounding it, but the Pacific theater and why so few people(mainly outside of Japan), overtly do revisionist work on what the Japanese did to their conquered peoples.

very few people are taught about things like the rape of nanking or whatever that chink place is called

or the fact that it didn't actually happen

Because victims of Japanese war crimes etc. wasn't important.

The only "victims of significance" during WW2 were the jews, and the public's eye during the aftermath of the war was drawn towards them as victims and the nazis as the ebul bad guy.

To dedicate the same amount of time and resources into investigating the actions of the Japanese would not really be to the benefit of anyone "of significance", and therefore not of any importance.

Plus, what said.

I'm not buying it. What makes you so sure that such an event as the Rape of Nanking didn't actually happen?

"A thousand gentile lives are not worth one Jewish toenail"
-Dov Lior, Chief Rabbi of Hebron and Kiryat Arba, head of the "Council of Rabbis of Judea and Samaria"

I remember there being a different version of that quote. It says "Arabs" specifically and refers to a Jewish "fingernail" instead of a toenail.

same with americans

because chinks are ugly who would actually wanna fuck them

you're correct about it being a fingernail. however, it appears the statement has been made by two separate rabbis, Dov Lior speaking of a thousand non-Jews and Yaacov Perin of a million Arabs

sources:
web.archive.org/web/20080413021822/http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4244
wrmea.org/1999-march/growing-intolerance-threatens-the-humane-jewish-tradition.html

In Germany allied (excluding Russians) POWs were treated in accordance with the Geneva convention generally. Still food shortages and forced labour, but they were holiday camps compared to Japanese POW camps

BUMP

japan knows it doesn't have to feel bad about conquest

I can see your point. However, they did go too far in how they treated the inhabitants of the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Burma, Cambodia, parts of New Guinea, and Malaysia.

What about how the Americans treated those poor pilots who flew over Pearl Harbour? Those pilots were just doing their job, and the bloody Americans called them war-like!