Why is it that there are much less people who openly do revisionist stuff and/or try to give more insight on the Japanese side of the WW2 story? Exactly why do fewer folks go on the defense of the Japanese on a serious level on what is said to have happened to many areas of China, Indonesia, Malaysia, the city-state of Singapore, Burma, The Andaman islands, Thailand, and parts of the island of New Guinea during the war,as opposed to the many tens of figures who dared to risk their reputation by questioning the HolyCo$t and contesting the fairness of the Nuremberg trials?
Question about WW2 Pacific Front
bitch pls, every single Japanese person denies that Japan did anything wrong ever
Every single Japanese man and woman denies anything wrong done during the 2nd world war.
I don't think so. It is indeed true that many Japanese schools, especially Public schools, do at most marginal touching on WW2, and they indeed should stop being in a state of denial. But saying that nobody who is Japanese believes what was done by their Military in China, Malaysia, and Singapore is just inaccurate! There needs to be more coverage of WW2 in Japanese public schools as well as more of them willing to swallow their pride and learn to look at the Pacific theater in the face and say "we accept our mistakes." But I am at least a couple bits curious as to the extent of what their military at the time did and did not actually do to inhabitants of place like Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand.
Asian culture is a lies based culture, thats all, a guy fucking his imouto will judge and call degenerate a dude doing the same.
Because the evidence supports Japans atrocities being factual while there is a lot of evidence against the official holocaust numbers.
Japanese Jews did nothing wrong
Because Japanese nationalism is basically dead. I mean, German nationalism is dead too but their ethnic brothers in the USA and UK do a good job of looking at history from the other sides perspective.
But with Japs, Americans instantly moved in and planted cock right in their ass and tried to make them America part 2. Didn't happen but American work ethic and business practice of the 40s and 50s became the standard of what a Jap man should be like.
That's my take, gosh I wish I could meet a Japanese nationalist.
I wish I could meet a Japanese nationalist
They're too busy fucking rubber child sex dolls
implying Japanese nationalists would speak to filthy gaijin
Fun fact, a event about vr porn has more people than tape related.
considering the Japanese governing body now has the majority of nationalists who wish to restore the old empire I think we might see a true rise in Japanese nationalism
and they now have the numbers to revise the Japanese constitution.
though if they do we will likely just fuck them in the ass before they can do anything.
implying that Japanese Nationalists all think the exact same way about the issue of people from other lands.
But hey, whatevs.
Are you aware the Yakuza is extremely nationalist?
is that why like half of them are Koreans?
yakuza bushido af
oh shit, looks like I mixed up Koreans and burakumin
kolea mastel lace , we bukkakke wapanese bulakumin
There needs to be more coverage of WW2 in Japanese public schools as well as more of them willing to swallow their pride and learn to look at the Pacific theater in the face and say "we accept our mistakes."
no you faggot
demoralization is no good for anyone
Hipocresy is better… for propaganda, if you assume that every non nip is a tard.
recognizing one's mistakes and accepting responsibility for what did happen
I think you mean 'yellow guilt'
WTF!? How the fuck is it collective guilt if one recognizes that one isn't born perfect, and mistakes happen? Also this thread IS NOT about the European theater and the debates surrounding it, but the Pacific theater and why so few people(mainly outside of Japan), overtly do revisionist work on what the Japanese did to their conquered peoples.
very few people are taught about things like the rape of nanking or whatever that chink place is called
or the fact that it didn't actually happen
Because victims of Japanese war crimes etc. wasn't important.
The only "victims of significance" during WW2 were the jews, and the public's eye during the aftermath of the war was drawn towards them as victims and the nazis as the ebul bad guy.
To dedicate the same amount of time and resources into investigating the actions of the Japanese would not really be to the benefit of anyone "of significance", and therefore not of any importance.
Plus, what said.
Rape of Nanking didn't really happen
I'm not buying it. What makes you so sure that such an event as the Rape of Nanking didn't actually happen?
"A thousand gentile lives are not worth one Jewish toenail"
-Dov Lior, Chief Rabbi of Hebron and Kiryat Arba, head of the "Council of Rabbis of Judea and Samaria"
I remember there being a different version of that quote. It says "Arabs" specifically and refers to a Jewish "fingernail" instead of a toenail.
same with americans
because chinks are ugly who would actually wanna fuck them
you're correct about it being a fingernail. however, it appears the statement has been made by two separate rabbis, Dov Lior speaking of a thousand non-Jews and Yaacov Perin of a million Arabs
In Germany allied (excluding Russians) POWs were treated in accordance with the Geneva convention generally. Still food shortages and forced labour, but they were holiday camps compared to Japanese POW camps
japan knows it doesn't have to feel bad about conquest
I can see your point. However, they did go too far in how they treated the inhabitants of the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Burma, Cambodia, parts of New Guinea, and Malaysia.
What about how the Americans treated those poor pilots who flew over Pearl Harbour? Those pilots were just doing their job, and the bloody Americans called them war-like!