I highly doubt this Italian swordmaster taught using two big swords like Dayne did
it was probably something like pic related
I highly doubt this Italian swordmaster taught using two big swords like Dayne did
it was probably something like pic related
...
yeah I dunno why they didn't just give him a short sword/dagger for his left hand, like the more common type of historical dual blade fighting
I mean even Musashi used a short blade in his off-hand didn't he?
he was talking about using a longsword in one hand. when talking about the buckler, because some people thank that you cant use a longsword in one hand, he was using the example where you can fence with a buckler and longsword
shocking
Biggest mistake was to reduce the number of men in the fight. It would've been more believable to see the original case of 3 badasses taking 5 enemies down with them instead of the awkward could-gank-him-but-we're-not-gonna fight they made
he isn't retarded but apparently you are
yeah, turning it into cartoony "watch me 1v4 noobs with muh dual-wield sword spinning faggotry" was a bad idea. I know the original point was that Ned's team had the superior numbers yet they barely made it, but they could've delivered that without the cringe.
knowing D&D, I doubt it
who /inlovewithmaisie/ here?