It's not unprecedented. In Amazing Spider-Man #500, Peter and Mary Jane had a son called Ben.
Of course, Sony probably would've called the son something retarded and completely non-sequitur.
It's not unprecedented. In Amazing Spider-Man #500, Peter and Mary Jane had a son called Ben.
Of course, Sony probably would've called the son something retarded and completely non-sequitur.
Firstly, you've never read Spider-Girl and secondly we wouldn't be talking about a gender swap but rather two completely separate and distinct characters.
Double-think, everyone.
...
No, I never did. Nothing about the character interests me. Stay mad.
I never even implied that I did read it. I said what a movie version would be like. You do realize that right?
No you fucking idiot. His first child not being a girl is a gender swap. It is that regardless of whether the boy is based on another character or is his own character.
It's really not double-think at all. I didn't say gender-swapping was bad entirely. I said that it being from a girl to a boy is more original, and it is. Learn to fucking read.
No it isn't you fucking idiot. If they're two distinct characters from two distinct continuities they haven't swapped anything.
Ultimate Jessica Drew is a gender swap. Movie Peter and MJ having a boy instead of a girl isn't. Unless he grows up to be Spider-Boy and even then it's debatable.
...
...