Stop liking militarism and psychopathic rulers, you bootlickers!

What happens if the party stops being a proletarian one? Even ☭TANKIE☭s acknowledge it happened multiple times; it's why they praise the Soviets for sending in the tanks (until it happened to the Soviet party and we got global counterrevolution - complete with former high-ranking party members turning into oligarchs.)

Without democratic accountability, there's no recourse if party leaders/de facto elites decide to look after their own interests at proletarian expense. A dictator might be a (tankie interpretation of) Stalin, but it can just as easily be a Deng or a Gorbachev.

This

Stop bothering. Guys like these are basically fascists, but instead of fascist/imperialist aesthetics they like the soviet-style imperialist aesthetics.
They would worship Hitler himself, if he made the hammer and sickle his flag.

Inb4 some butthurt ☭TANKIE☭ comes in saying "u compare communism and fascism so ur a dumb liberal!!!"

the deep anarkiddie analysis strikes again

Yep, here we have one already

The fact that you think fascism can be left wing and compare it to the people who sacrificed everything to defeat fascism confirms that you're liberal.

I'm not but where did you get this "fascism can be left wing"?

...

A centralized party IS free association of producers.