Borders are only a spook for american people who don't grasp how a real nation operates and americanized euros who are liberal urbanites LARPing as leftists.
The problem of that people would be solved with work. They have too much free time.
Borders are only a spook for american people who don't grasp how a real nation operates and americanized euros who are liberal urbanites LARPing as leftists.
The problem of that people would be solved with work. They have too much free time.
I believe in an eventual borderless society but we obviously aren't there yet. That being said if you could somehow magic away all the borders the ensuing chaos would almost certainly accelerate us towards some kind of a revolution, but more likely a reactionary one
What's the difference?
"Open borders" still retains borders, it just means that now you can import poormies over them.
Are you saying that you can't import poormies with "Abolishing borders"?
No, you crypto/pol/ dipshit.
So can you explain how capitalists cannot import poormies without borders?
Capitalists are HELPED by loose migration laws since the best and brightest of the Third World run off to the imperialist/exploiter countries rather than wage socialist revolution at home. Once in the First World, these migrants end up becoming consumerist whores and fail privy to all the fallings of western/imperialist culture.
For instance, the king of Morocco sends his country's "problem children" to Europe out of fear he may be overthrown in an Arab Spring-tier uprising. Pretty sure the regime in Algeria does this as well. Not surprising, nearly all the "Islamic terrorist" attacks which have happened in western Europe for the past four years have been committed by Maghrebis (both Paris attacks, Brussels, Nice, and so on).
ISIS is an american invention to attack Europe
if borders aren't "real" then why oppose them? how do you oppose something non-existent?
if they're not there, then the problem is already solved.
"spooks" is code for anarchists cannot into materialism