What do you think of George Soros?

What do you think of George Soros?

He's worth 7 billion dollars, stole from jews in Hungary during the holocaust while a jew himself disguised as a Christian.

He's wrote about 14 books criticising capitilism, given 75% of his wealth away to charities, criticises capitilism openly.

Thoughts?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=QSyczwuTQfo
itsgoingdown.org/george-soros-globalism-far-right-explains-revolt/
hartford-hwp.com/archives/63/105.html
patrioticmillionaires.org/
youtube.com/watch?v=mGC3uJadXh0
youtube.com/watch?v=W8Id0-Lsyr0
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

He needs to fire whoever is responsible for sending us checks because the last 6 have been weeks late. I can't afford my super soldier serum without them.

I want a raise for bashing le fash.

It's like Bill Gates giving to the poor makes him a hero.

Rich people can't be anti-capitalism?

He's a good businessman so he recognizes capitalism's contradictions, his "criticisms" amount to putting band-aid on a cancer patient so he could keep his porkbux while pacifying proles.

le fund anti soviet groups man

Fucker gets the guillotine
He was literally a nazi collaborator during WWII and described that time as "the best years of his life" during an interview.

literally whomst

why does the right meme this man and why should i care

Unless he's suicidal he's not going to overthrow his own power.

help financed the fall of communism in Europe; liberal trash

I'd like to see a citation for this and know exactly what he said.

I don't have them but from this interview he probably wrote them to call for more regulations to drive out his competitors and empower himself since he can afford to avoid them. It's pure bullshit.
youtube.com/watch?v=QSyczwuTQfo

that's what I thought.

He's just the old Judeo-Bolshevik conspiracy theory rolled up into one man, with some Nazism sprinkled in to spook Ameriflats even more

A Corbyn government should seize any assets he holds in UK jurisdiction in punishment for his actions on Black Wednesday.
the government was engaged in an economically illiterate scheme at the time, but regardless wealthy individuals subverting the policy of democratic governments must be slapped.

itsgoingdown.org/george-soros-globalism-far-right-explains-revolt/
found this an interesting read a while ago.

Here is a good piece on him
hartford-hwp.com/archives/63/105.html

To me, it's so transparent what he's trying to do. I can't imagine someone who isn't disingenuous not seeing it. If you're actually confused about him supporting social democracy, read about what happened during the great depression. There were capitalist that supported the social democratic policies of FDR so that government would offset the externalities of a shit system, and they could continue the business of fleecing the proles. Hell, there are still capitalist that do this. Look at the patriotic millionaires association patrioticmillionaires.org/

Also, the fact Soros considers what he's doing "amoral" should give you a glimpse into the mind of a capitalist.

Sup Holla Forums, whatcha doin'?

I've been shilling hard on Holla Forums for a year and I still haven't gotten my Sorosbux,

They know what they're doing is wrong, but they don't really care. Sound like some other groups we encounter?

I want him to give me a raise.

Nah, he really thinks it's "amoral". It's essentially what people do when they conflate capitalism with human nature, and remove the economy from "rightness" and "wrongness". Soros is a scumbag, but I don't have any reason to doubt he's an honest scumbag after being so candid.

I mean that he knows that he's a scumbag, but he still keeps on being a scumbag even with the knowledge that he is one.

so, he's doing the most logical thing for a capitalist to do: force other capitalists to finance him by using the government.

What level of capital are we on that this is possible?

>>>Holla Forums

Liberal anticommunist scum

FTFY

I have never seen a shred of evidence for this. Wasn't he a literal child during WWII?

t. idpols

A great hero, savior of the republic, a peacemaker and a liberator.

Sheev did nothing wrong. The empire was an anti-imperialist force.

or people joking, which apparently you're too retarded to comprehend

That's not Anakin though.

youtube.com/watch?v=mGC3uJadXh0

The absolute state of this board

I don't know much about him, but considering the right wing has built him up to be the god jew that funds everything conservatives don't like from Antifi to the androgynous cashier that gives them gay thoughts. He's prolly nothing more than some milquetoast neo-liberal like Obama.

I wish I lived in the world the American right thinks we live in. Were Obama took all the guns away and stuck the right-wingers into FEMA camps and was implementing full communism by building an army of Traps.

after Soros is robbed blind he will be shot in the back alley like the Porky he is

How can you steal what's already yours?

intellectual gibberish

Lmao not really. It's an important distinction to make.

Wrong

Are you seriously too autistic to tell when people are being ironic, or are you just new?

You are so fucking stupid.

Gonna need source on this. He's enough of a sociopath without needing to Godwin him.

That said, I suggest scaphism.

He might as well come out and shout with despotic fervor: democracy is ME!

(You) have to go back retard

...

youtube.com/watch?v=W8Id0-Lsyr0

He doesn't even regret it.

i think he did terrible things, e.g. the sterling crisis, the baht crisis, supporting numerous neoliberal coups, supporting anti-communist and anti-socialist think thanks etc. pp.
in comparison to the other capitalist oligarch shits he still seems to be much much less evil to me though, i might even go as far as believing that he is not an inherently bad person and is actually serious about "liberal freedom". him engaging in charity and spending a lot of money and the fact that he is the literal bogeyman for Holla Forums and all neofascist "movements" in europe backs this notion. he's perhaps one of those liberals that could become, with a probability of less than 1%, an ally of us against neofascism.

I highly doubt that. He helped end communism in Hungary

There is no such thing as jokes or figurative language. It's all bait, a ruse to fool innocent posters into making idiots out of themselves. We will not put up with this shit.

i know. what's more, i suspect he also helped to subvert the originally still communist/socialist leftist opposition in the ddr along with the church (both catholic and evangelics), transforming them into liberals/greens, which led to the demise of socialism here in 1989.
however these times are long gone, there is worse shit rising than liberals now and he's under threat by that as well. i don't like liberals, but if i had to opt between them and no ally, the choice would be rather quick i guess.
.webm was shot recently in italy; pic is from germany, also recent

...

why is time so cruel

The skin around his eyes makes me both nauseated and exhausted at the same time.

Tbh anons, Casapound is kinda scary. None of this Holla Forumsyp shit, they are actually worrying fash รก la Russia or Ukraine.

Oh wow! It's like when you undermine and propagate to destroy the left to save your ass the working class turns towards reactionary politics! And now there's nobody left to save it again! Except now the world's going to die too thanks to nationalism! Thanks Soros!

liberals chose fasicism over socialism 10/10 times

See, you're perfectly right from a pragmatic point of view. However, that choice would not be up to the left, but to liberals, and historically, they have taken the worst option possible.

Stalin saw that, the way things were going in Europe in the 30s, two of the three sides were likely to pile on the third, so he set out to not be that third. He proposed an alliance with France and the UK in April, because he would much rather ally with capitalist liberals than do any business with fascists, and because a capitalist invasion was less likely than a fascist one. But even tho allying with Germany wasn't even an option for them, the Western powers still hemmed and hawed, mainly because Poland utterly refused passage to the Red Army in case Germany attacked it in fear of being annexed by Stalin, but another factor is that they simply were more sympathetic to fascism than to communism for various reasons. If only Poland had agreed, or if France and the UK had told Poland to get fucked, WW2 would have been avoided, or at least would have been a much quicker and less violent affair. At least we get to laugh at the irony of Poland getting invaded by both Germany and the USSR. Anyway, the negotiations with the UK and France were going nowhere, so in August Stalin decided, fuck it, forget any alliances, I'll just NAP Germany and be done with it. Whoops.

In the end, if only the UK didn't think Germany was a threat to their dominance, it would have eagerly signed a pact with Hitler early on and dispatched those bloody regicidal Reds from the Earth.

spent years trying to sign an alliance or at least a NAP with the Western powers, especially France and the UK, and as you might guess, they refused to help a Red, and not long afterwards, would sign NAPs with fucking Hitler and Mussolini. The sad truth is, while liberalism might be ideologically closer to the left, capitalists' material interests align with the right, so rightwards they'll always go.

...

See, you're perfectly right from a pragmatic point of view. However, that choice would not be up to the left, but to liberals, and historically, they have taken the worst option possible.

Stalin saw that, the way things were going in Europe in the 30s, two of the three sides were likely to pile on the third, so he set out to not be that third. He proposed an alliance with France and the UK in April, because he would much rather ally with capitalist liberals than do any business with fascists, and because a capitalist invasion was less likely than a fascist one. But even tho allying with Germany wasn't even an option for them, the Western powers still hemmed and hawed, mainly because Poland utterly refused passage to the Red Army in case Germany attacked it in fear of being annexed by Stalin, but another factor is that they simply were more sympathetic to fascism than to communism for various reasons. If only Poland had agreed, or if France and the UK had told Poland to get fucked, WW2 would have been avoided, or at least would have been a much quicker and less violent affair. At least we get to laugh at the irony of Poland getting invaded by both Germany and the USSR. Anyway, the negotiations with the UK and France were going nowhere, so in August Stalin decided, fuck it, forget any alliances, I'll just NAP Germany and be done with it. Whoops.

In the end, if only the UK didn't think Germany was a threat to their dominance, it would have eagerly signed a pact with Hitler early on and dispatched those bloody regicidal Reds from the Earth.

(oops, forgot to delete draft text in previous attempt at this post.)

Did Stalin really need to invade Poland though?

Would he be Stalin if he hadn't?

you are right, the left has been betrayed by liberals numerous times starting from the french revolution onwards. so chances for obtaining liberals like george soros or warren buffet (he also critisized capitalism publicly and donates a lot of his fortune to charity) as allies are very slim with regard to historic communist/socialist and liberal relations. that's why i surely wouldn't bet on liberals in any scenario, but completely ruling out cooperation with these moderate capitalists ("moderate" means here that some common ground does exist, meanwhile there is no common ground with fascists at all) would be reckless and tactically very stupid, in my opinion at least.

...

Here you go, a detailed account of how France, UK and Poland fucked literally everything up for everybody.


I suppose you're right, but keeping them from backstabbing us is a difficult task, especially since there are always fags on the left that end up helping them.