Hey I'm trying to figure out a solution to this question

Hey I'm trying to figure out a solution to this question.
If a top down management economy such as socialism is supposed to be a stable and useful economy then how come its easily susceptible to outside forces? Before you ban me, just take a moment to really think about it. A self sustaining economy such as socialism should be able to exist outside of external market forces, the money has nowhere it needs to go in so far as a stable food and goods exchange. Nationalised resource management should be self sustaining right?
Yes I am talking about Venezuela.

Other urls found in this thread:

foxnews.com/world/2010/07/18/socialism-private-sector-dominates-venezuelan-economy-despite-chavez-crusade.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Bamp

Well user, that's because Venezuela is literally under the capitalist mode of production.

Venezuela aint nationalized for shit, son.

...

that's called capitalism

Norway is more "socialist" than Venezuela is

70% PRIVATIZATED ECONOMY

Check the catalog before making a thread, have a sage. user, Cuba is about 3/4 to 4/5 state-owned sector, China ~1/2, Scandinavian countries ~1/3, and Venezuela has a slightly smaller public sector than Scandinavian countries.

Socialism isn't nationalization. Also about 70% of Venezuela's economy is privately owned.