they aren't. a prole that owns 2 apartments and 3 cars is a petty-bourg. there is no revolutionary potential under these conditions
in imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism, which is literally m-l 101 reading.
they aren't. a prole that owns 2 apartments and 3 cars is a petty-bourg. there is no revolutionary potential under these conditions
in imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism, which is literally m-l 101 reading.
woah you're right that brainlet really can't compare to the advanced critique of your scientific methodology
owning mop makes you a petty-bourg. if you don't understand this, you are a brainlet indeed
This is either Agela "there is nobody in Germany earning less than 2000 EUR" merkel-tier bullshit, OR I'm moving to switzerland.
I don't remember that Lenin was turd-worldist shill, but I'll reread it tomorrow.
You sound like petty-bourg living in some closed community which spends free time reading leftist theory in order to feel superior in front of friends.
I didn't know apartments and cars were the means of production so can you link me to the chapters in capital where marx explains that tia
It's a shitty balance though. The most exploited nations would be invaded if they had a socialist revolution, or a coup would be funded, because that'd be in the interests of their previous imperialist fuckdaddy. The most imperialist nations are much better candidates for revolution. If a large portion of the US rose up it would send shockwaves around the world, because of how intertwined the US is in world affairs. So the other countries would be too busy to stop the revolution.
anything that can generate capital is a mop. if i have a car, i can rent it. an apartment can also be rented
it is hard, but there is no revolutionary potential in the imperialist nations because the bourgeoisie have a greater influence there. it's easier to paint a revolutionary movement as terrorists inside us soil than fund a coup in a 3rd world country.
Aaaah so everyone is a bourg because they can use the P*nis or V*gin* to generate capital it all makes sense
thanks bookposter you really helped this poor brainlet out
Let's take a number of businesses next to me.
-Non-chain Sushi restaurant
-Wal-Mart
-McDonalds (Chain restaurant)
How would you re-organize production within these establishments?
1. The Sushi one, I think most would agree, should retain some autonomy. But how exactly would it work? Would the previous boss own the restaurant? What would change, if anything?
2. The Wal-mart. What do you do with this? Much of the goods there come from third world sweatshops, so until a US re-industrialization is completed, it's going to be half empty most days. You could tear it down and put something else, but you'd be putting people out of work and possibly screwing up the supply. Or, this makes the most sense, you simply turn it into a nationalized consumer goods distribution center. But then how would it work? Who would be the manager? Is it even necessary to have such a massive (in size) consumer goods dispensary? More than half of those goods are useless shit anyway.
3. The McDonalds. Terrible food, but changing that is the easy part. Would the workplace be democratized? Would each McDonalds have the ability to cook its own style of food,instead of everything being standardized?
How many layers of seizing toothbrushes are you on?
Try to name one(1) non-western country where bourgeoisie do not have much greater influence than general population.
And it's easier to organize, unionize and protest in liberal democratic capitalist nation than some third world military junta.