Dutch police to ‘undress’ youths wearing clothes deemed too expensive for them

Shut the fuck up you contrarian stuck up dipshit

If I was still mod I would have banned you for two years.

Enjoy buying your Rick Owens faggot ;^)

Enjoy your pay Officer

It's amazing how hard you miss the point. Not sure if you're willfully ignorant or completely retarded. Either way, kill yourself.

Enjoy your pay officer

Enjoy your pay, Officer

Officer, please enjoy your pay

You probably wear fucking jnco jeans you stupid miserable fuck

👮

...

I guess america can't anymore either, but at least it was at one point the intention.

How in the almighty god of fuck can clothes undermine a rule of law

BYE BYE CRIMINAL SCUM
NO MORE CLOTHING FOR CRIMINAL SCUM

Baboon boy, you have jumped the shark. Stick with baboons.

He says, getting arrested for wearing "high class fashy", dragged away screeching like a baboon in heat, ironically about baboons.

Baboon boy….

At the bare minimum it's sexual harassment. But if a girl isn't wearing anything other than a bra under a baggy """"""expensive"""""" tshirt, then yeah, that's borderline assault.

If it's pants it's definitely assault.

This begs the question how the police will use this as an excuse for nefarious and sickening acts. I can't imagine this law will last long, but then again, Hell World

How does one look "too poor" to wear expensive clothing? Do they judge your facial features or something?

Basically this law gives police the ability to sexually harass and abuse the poor for "Not Wearing the Right Clothes". As if being poor requires a fucking uniform.

you can do better

OH PUHLEEZ, YOU AND I BOTH KNOW HOW ONE CAN LOOK "TOO POOR" ;););)

The wonderful thing about this law is it doesn't specify lol

Yeah, a majority of Holla Forums

Luckily they're concentrated in America and Britain

You

WHERE ARE THEIR EXPENSIVE CLOTHES THOUGH?

THEIR OUTFITS ARE VERY BEFITTING OF THEIR SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS

GO WALK DOWN MARTIN LUTHER KANG BOULEVARD AND TAKE OF ALL THE 300 DOLLAR AIR JORDANS YOU SEE.

WHERE DID THE AIR JORDANS COMES FROM?

WHERE?

WHERREEEEE ????

I HAVE NO IDEA WHERE AIR JORDANS COME FROM

YOU CAN'T ANSWER!

Police Officers: Grabbing ten women aside for "wearing the wrong clothes" and stripping them nose to navel, then charging them for public indecency. They sue for sexual assault but the police were acting in their lawful right.

Wonderful.

This is worse than the fucking TSA. Ironic that proponents of not letting immigrants in because they "sexually assault en masse", will cheer these laws with open arms

grailed.com/

You can buy shit here for like a 10th of the price. Anyways what men or women wear is nof no consequence to the fucking authorities.

Holla Forums: The Year of Our Lord 2018: STRIP THE SUSPICIONS ONES. ASSAULT THEM ALL

You are not the true Baboonposter. Please stop pretending, you're not fooling anyone.

Maybe the police shouldn't randomly strip men and women of their clothes

Baboon boy....these are used. Not variants. Even if they were, who cares. It's fucking clothes for cheap.

Baboon Boy has gone full circle form "NO MORE BABOONS, SHARIAH LAW NO MORE, BABOONS BYE BYE MUH FREEDOM"

to

"Why yes, I would like women and men of the lower class stripped of their clothes in public for shaming the upper class"

Plenty are?

What made you this way

Interesting to bring up drug dealing, as I have a suspicion you binge adderall

i have a suspicion he binges on stuff he finds under his sink

What's next boy, public stoning? Why do you types hate Islam yet work to be as much of a stereotype of them as you imagine. What is it? A fetish?

I mean, people can iron their clothes

Excellent accelerationism. Gotta go fast!

and that's why you're not a mod

I wouldn't have not been a mod in the case because it's blatant shitposting and defending the vanguard of private property stripping innocent civilians just for being poor.

I went overboard on an /r9k/ thread is why I got revoked. To be honest I'm happy for it. Being a mod was both funny, and annoying to deal with.

I like being a poster better.

hoochie will you please be my gf

Hoochie, you were literally the only mod in the banlog lots of days. How did you fucking do it? Are you a NEET?

it's two years

I'd agree with the ban, but two years is way too long.

Arent you guys in favour of this kind of thing?
I mean ffs this is real socialism right?

no, hoochie is just a Holla Forums tier ideologue who can't stand dissent *these kind of bannings are why I mostly brows leftpol*

see this is the post that should be banned. low energy trolling from pol *or some other shit board*

NO MORE CLOTHES FOR BABOONS
CLOTHES ARE FOR PEOPLE
LOIN CLOTHES FOR BABOONS
Bye
Bye
Byyyyyyyyyyyyyyeeeee🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈

...

I still don't get this meme.

A few people encouraged him at first so now he posts it in every thread in a cry for attention.

Truuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

Sexy…

Hey if you got nothing to hide you got nothing to fear. btw it looks like you're hiding some really fine tits there, so my suspicion is going up if you know what I mean. Time to strip in the name of the law, sugarbuns.

If only they didn't stop at poor people

Mandatory star trek uniforms is the solution to so many of the worlds problems.

Socialist utopia will put all name fag to the wall.
LUL.

W-what?

*takes your wallet*
Fascism was a mistake.

Cant wait for the revolution when we can do the same with porky's bank accounts.

Huh, funny that you people are against this.

>Porky… your life is too expensive. We'll have to take that from you.

...

It's a good meme. I'm actually the CIA contractor who paid to have it made. We love to shit up this board as part of our psyops. Leftwing thought is what my boss hates the most. He's always hyperventilating about communists keeping his profits down.

Why do so many Holla Forumstards have KGB/"deep state"/ect connections?

also

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Do I really have to say it?

was meant for>>2368126

Lol it's cops raping preppy twinks

...

good, filthy kulaks should have all their fancy shit given to the people

ayncraps ITT need to gtfo

KILL ALL COPS

Good job checking the facts, retards. The article is taking the entire thing out of context, here's what's ACTUALLY going on:

1. These individuals are already know to the police due to either a criminal record or having been a suspect before.

2. These individuals do NOT have any official income, they are either in debt or on welfare.

3. If you're in debt or on welfare AND you have a criminal record or are suspected of a crime AND you are wearing 1800 dollar jackets or a rolex, ONLY then does this entire thing come into play.

Explain to me a situation in which the above is all true and the resulting action is NOT justified, instead of talking out of your asses.

nothing cops do is 'justified.' they are thugs and criminals

Not the point.

If NOTHING they do is justified, then this thread serves no purpose in the first place, since it doesn't matter if the subject is outrageous or not, you'd reject the notion either way.

I am saying that what is being reported here is NOT TRUE. And you're all buying it because you don't check, you just parrot, absording ideas that confirm with your already established worldview and rejecting others.

You fall for weak propaganda. Be a good useful idiot and off yourself.

i believe you when you say it's not true. but cops are still scum

People should be banned from making clickbait threads

Normaal doen loont.

So the article is accurate and our outrage is justified. Good to know.

"""""YOUTHS"""""" == BLACK """"PEOPLE"'''

DON'T NEED THEM, DON'T WANT THEM

WEW LAD!

retard

Yeah stripping someone in public outside of their own home by the enforcers of private property itself, with a racial identity bias, is fucked up.

You don’t get to randomly grab someone, rip off their clothes, and if they fight back arrest them.

That’s stupid

EASY MONEY

Except that its not private property.

Hot tbqh.

be brown

wew this is next level retardation

There's a question to consider of just where something becomes land.
A house isn't movable property, but what about the materials of the house?

You may not own the land it's on, but as long as you continue to use it, where does it land?

I assumed they were immovable and therefore private property, but I've seen folks claim otherwise. And there is a substantial difference between owning the house you live in and owning the house you don't live in that somebody else lives in.

This train will take you to your gulag now, comrade.

0.5/10 for making me reply

For using the term "private property"?

Communism means worker ownership of the means of production and collective ownership of the products of those means. And here you are calling me dense for challenging the concept of private property with a fucking hammer and sickle flag. neck yourself retard.

the time for questions is over now, comrade

Literally no shit. That was never in disagreement.

Reread the OP and stop being a brainlet.

Collective ownership is, by definition, antithetical to private property

When did LeftComs become retarded?

The clothes on your back are personal property, not private property. It's an important distinction. Your clothes and personal possessions are not communal or public property, nor are they private property.

...

Whatever you think but this is the police literally admitting to stealing from people and expecting you to suck it up. Kill yourself you fucking bootlicker.

Are we being raided by Holla Forums? What's up with the influx of brainlets lately.

...

glad I don't live in r*tterdam
that being said, I don't wear designer clothes and don't know anyone that does
call me a jackass but I don't really give a fuck about a bunch of drug-dealing lumpens getting shafted

t. dutchie