Unsurprisingly, but it remains surely the case that divergent evolution is occurring in the human population.
Locke, Hobbes, Hume, and Paine
Unsurprisingly, but it remains surely the case that divergent evolution is occurring in the human population.
Locke, Hobbes, Hume, and Paine
I know, but he's on about the broader subject of which compassion is a subheading
Which he rejects as romantic liberal wank.
Precisely, nor should I feel particularly filled with hope at Kropotkin's rhetorical attempt to elevate an economic transaction to the status of a moral ideal.
Morality isn't a factor. It's based in pragmatic self interest.
Like killing kulaks, starving Ukranians and taking their shit cause you can.
But you're getting it backwards. The reason they can't be productive is because they were born into a microcosm of poor education, poor nutrition, poor community, and few opportunities. How the fuck can you say you want a meritocracy when you where born into a 100m dash with a 50m head start over other racers?
I'm just saying, nothing about pragmatic self interest or some idea of ethical egoism stands in the way of any conceivable act of violence. Ann Frank was just flat out wrong to conceive of people as inherently good for any reason, and her life is a testimony to that fact and nothing else.
This meme has been btfo enough, there are plenty of scholarships one can get if you work for it? So why don't I see more hardworking ghetto dwellers on campus? Oh that's right, because there is actually a darwinian dialectic at work in everything and those people are returning to the primordial soup as we speak.
If the human garbage of which we are speaking actually had a work ethic, nothing could hold them down. The Jews used to live in ghettoes 150 years ago and it was enforced, but the second Jewish emancipation happened they rushed right to the top positions in society, so much so that it still makes incel Nazis mad to this day.