Maoism or Hoxhaism?

HOXHA IS DE LEON GANG

How can Mautists not be fucking ashamed of this?

Didn't Mao's China also recognize Israel early on?

What that dumb fat basement dwelling fuck canuck does is never relevant to anything

Hoxhaism really only exists in historical context. Hoxhaism generally isn't significantly different from other forms of anti-revisionist Marxism-Leninism (including even a lot of MZT groups). Hoxhaist as a label arose from the Sino-Albanian split and isn't really useful outside of that context.

A lot of Hoxha's criticisms of Mao were absolutely justified and shared by most Maoists (both of the MZW and MLM varieties). As someone else in this thread said, Maoism is less about the person of Mao as it is certain philosophical and practical innovations. Whether one takes them as a quantitative or qualitative break from Marxism-Leninism is the basis of the disagreement between MZT and MLM groups.

I think it's worth remembering not to give much credence to the "Stalinist-Hoxhaist" "Comintern." It's ~5 people living in Germany who criticize Mao for being a Confucian who mixed Marxism with Chinese mysticism, which is baseless and just plain racist.

Marxism-Leninism-Maoism is generally defined by what you listed, alongside a few other things like New Democracy. I would say that describing New Democracy as "just the NEP for Chinese conditions" is a bit of an unfair characterization. I think it probably stems from the oft-repeated idea that the NEP existed to provide a capitalist stage before collectivization, which isn't really true. There isn't any necessity of there being a capitalist stage if a socialist revolution happens in a feudal state, the NEP existed to allow the economy to recover after the devastation of the civil war. New Democracy, as opposed to being a policy for the specific set of conditions in a country at a given point is more of a principle. New Democracy says in essence that in certain countries pre-revolution (like China), the interests of the national bourgeoisie, peasants and proletariat all for the most part line up, i.e, it is in the interest of all three of these groups in an occupied nation to expel the occupiers. This of course doesn't mean that there aren't contradictions between them and their interests, it just means that it is more in there interest to work together at that time. New Democracy, then, is the temporary alliance of the proletariat and peasantry with the national bourgeoisie.

I hadn't intended to write so much about New Democracy but I think it's worth clearing up for this discussion. Vital for understanding New Democracy is an understanding of Mao's idea of the people vs the enemy. As Mao says in "On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People":
"[W]e must first be clear on what is meant by 'the people' and what is meant by 'the enemy'… At the present stage, the period of building socialism, the classes, strata and social groups which favour, support and work for the cause of socialist construction all come within the category of the people, while the social forces and groups which resist the socialist revolution and are hostile to or sabotage socialist construction are all enemies of the people."

In Mao's opinion, at the time of the founding of the PRC, the contradictions between the proletariat and the national bourgeoisie was "non-antagonistic," as opposed to the antagonistic contradictions between the proletariat and the imperialist bourgeoisie, or even the national bourgeoisie and imperialist bourgeoisie at times. The idea then was to create a state led by the proletariat (as it must be) that represents also a temporary alliance between the other classes with similar interests. The little stars on the flag of the PRC originally represented the proletariat, peasantry, national bourgeoisie and urban petty bourgeoisie. This is first and foremost, however, a /temporary/ alliance led by the proletariat that can be abrogated at any time (as it was in the GPCR).

The Three Worlds Theory was fucking bullshit and among Mao's biggest theoretical blunders. It's been rightfully criticized by basically everyone.

I think I was gonna talk about something else in this post but I forget so fuck it

A certain pseud and Jewish jihadist from this board have said the same thing.

I've been away from Holla Forums for like a year at least and I have no clue what you mean

also who the fuck got rid of the mautism flag, now I gotta use the fucking PRC flag and look like a Dengist

Anal Water claimed Mao's dialectics were "monist" and Chaya said Mao was a Daoist in her long-winded response to Roo.

Do you think Roo is a real Maoist or just a poseur?

Do you mean Unruhe? I'm not sure who the other two people are.

Unruhe isn't even a Marxist, let alone a Maoist. Third Worldism has a fundamentally different analysis from Marxism and the two aren't reconcilable.

Explain. In what ways are they opposed?